Re: Status Meeting (November 2018)

Dick <[email protected]> Wed, 28 Nov 2018 19:35:49 +0100 (CET)
Newsgroups gmane.os.reactos.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
It is common use to start beta from 0.5 because it is half way up to 1.0. 
bringing 0.5 as alpha willl cause much disappointment and is confusing for 
users.
I think an interesting point to talk about would be a roadmap. when can 
average users start to use reactos as their daily os? Is reactos able to 
become usable as windows-alternative before windows is gone and forgotten?

On Wed, 28 Nov 2018, David Quintana (gigaherz) wrote:

> I agree on "beta" being more like 80-90% implementation coverage, however
> given the 80/20 rule applied to development, that says that < 20% of the
> bugs cause >80% of the bug reports (I'd guess this will be 5% of the bugs
> causing 95% of the reports, if not even more), so one could argue that
> having a codebase 80% complete, is still only 50% of the work, because the
> other 50% will be a whole lot of polishing.
> 
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 18:03, Ged Murphy <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>       The link between 0.5 and beta was an old statement we used to
>       have on our website, I’m not sure why that relationship existed
>       other than a splitting an integer in half and assigning 0.5 to
>       each stage.
>
>       I’m more of the opinion that beta products are close to release,
>       so 0.8+ would be more suitable.
>
>        
>
>       Anyway, it’s a conversation to be had internally.
>
>        
>
>       Ged.
>
>        
>
>       From: Ros-dev <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
>       [email protected]
>       Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 16:51
>       To: ReactOS Development List <[email protected]>
>       Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Status Meeting (November 2018)
>
>        
>
>       ‌Hi!
>
>       Usually when we talk about ReactOS 0.5, we implicitly think that
>       it will enter beta state there.
>       So unless you consider this to not completely hold anymore, we
>       can look at what remains to be done/fixed (importantly) so that
>       we may qualify as going into beta state.
>       (And yes, USB and storage sound strongly as prerequisites for
>       0.5 in my opinion).
>
>       Best,
>       Hermes
>
>       De : "Ged Murphy"
>       A : "'ReactOS Development List'"
>       Envoyé: mercredi 28 novembre 2018 17:42
>       Objet : Re: [ros-dev] Status Meeting (November 2018)
>        
>
>       Some potential talking points:
>
>        
>
>        o  Selecting a new coordinator
>        o  Version bump to 0.5
>        o  USB / Storage (perhaps linked to a 0.5 release)
>        o  Mattermost
>        o  New website progress
>
>        
>
>        
>
>       From: Ros-dev <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Mark
>       Jansen
>       Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 16:13
>       To: ReactOS Development List <[email protected]>
>       Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Status Meeting (November 2018)
>
>        
>
>       We can discuss this if you are present, but I don't see the
>       value in discussing it without you.
> 
> We have seen before that something discussed without the initiator
> being present is time not well spent, since it is a bit hard to argue
> with only one side of the argument present
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Op 26 nov. 2018 12:15 schreef [email protected]:
>
>       Hello,
>
>       I may not be available as it's the day when I'm going
>       somewhere for a conference; it just depends at which time
>       I arrive at destination.
>
>       For the meeting we may talk about the best way we can move
>       to delivering all-in-one ReactOS ISOs (containing livecd +
>       installation in both text and GUI modes), and which
>       changes this could imply for our infrastructure
>       (buildbots/website...).
>
>       Best regards,
>       Hermes
>
>       De : "Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo"
>       A : "ReactOS Development List"
>       Envoyé: samedi 24 novembre 2018 22:06
>       Objet : Re: [ros-dev] Status Meeting (November 2018)
>        
>
>       I'm at work but I will do my best to attend!
> 
>  
> 
> El sáb., 24 nov. 2018 21:38, Colin Finck <[email protected]>
> escribió:
>
>       Hi all!
>
>       Let me invite you to the November 2018 meeting,
>       taking place next
>       Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 19:00 UTC.
>       Invited members will again receive their credentials
>       shortly before the
>       meeting.
>
>       This will be the first meeting since August and I
>       hope we get some more
>       topics than just the obligatory Status Reports.
>       Please send your
>       proposals by replying to this mail.
> 
>
>       Best regards,
>
>       Colin
>
>       _______________________________________________
>       Ros-dev mailing list
>       [email protected]
>       http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> 
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev