Re: The situation with version 0.4.14

--===============0837451196210258428==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a3f22a05baee43d4"

--000000000000a3f22a05baee43d4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

there have been many fixes recently. But, as i have already said, i see no
point on no releasing a new alpha build. It=C2=B4s still alpha, not stable.
Crashes and bugs are expected.

On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:35 PM Colin Finck <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is not the kind of participation that has any place on the mailing
> list of an open-source project.
> Unsubscribed and blocked that person.
>
> Colin
>
>
> Am 09.02.2021 um 17:26 schrieb Dick:
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> > as a potential user this project makes me extremely tired. in 2000 or
> > something like that i was excited because  afvree windows replacement
> > would be there...... it is 221!!! years later and there is...... still
> > nothing, jst deep alpha as stated in last email. and 0.14 woudl have
> > even regressions for 0.4.13. wouldnt it be more smart to finally build =
a
> > timeline for this all? or to discuss the fact if this project makes any
> > sense yet, it seems just a waste of time this way.
> > when things go on this slow when will reactos 1.0 finally be there? in
> > 2050? who cna tell if we even run software on a laptop or pc than, if
> > there is even a device available on which this will runn at all or if
> > there would be one singel user wanting to use something not totlaly
> > ai-driven?
> > reactos was ment as a user-project, like ubuntu for many users as their
> > desktop os. now it is just some fun for a few devs resulting in nothing
> > usable after 20 years. what is the idea behind this? if i was the
> > maintainer of this project i would state this:
> > we can do 2 things: 1. work hard and build version 1.0 in 5 years from
> now
> > or 2. stoop this waste of time of running behind the facts and having t=
o
> > rebuild it everytime agian because the project goes to slow for hardwar=
e
> > it is written for to end up in a museum before somethign happens.
> > as an end-user i am highly disappointed in this project.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ros-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>

--000000000000a3f22a05baee43d4
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">there have been many fixes recently. But, as i have alread=
y said, i see no point on no releasing a new alpha build. It=C2=B4s still a=
lpha, not stable. Crashes and bugs are expected.<br></div><br><div class=3D=
"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at =
5:35 PM Colin Finck &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">colin@reactos.=
org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"marg=
in:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1e=
x">This is not the kind of participation that has any place on the mailing =
<br>
list of an open-source project.<br>
Unsubscribed and blocked that person.<br>
<br>
Colin<br>
<br>
<br>
Am 09.02.2021 um 17:26 schrieb Dick:<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Hi,<br>
&gt; as a potential user this project makes me extremely tired. in 2000 or =
<br>
&gt; something like that i was excited because=C2=A0 afvree windows replace=
ment <br>
&gt; would be there...... it is 221!!! years later and there is...... still=
 <br>
&gt; nothing, jst deep alpha as stated in last email. and 0.14 woudl have <=
br>
&gt; even regressions for 0.4.13. wouldnt it be more smart to finally build=
 a <br>
&gt; timeline for this all? or to discuss the fact if this project makes an=
y <br>
&gt; sense yet, it seems just a waste of time this way.<br>
&gt; when things go on this slow when will reactos 1.0 finally be there? in=
 <br>
&gt; 2050? who cna tell if we even run software on a laptop or pc than, if =
<br>
&gt; there is even a device available on which this will runn at all or if =
<br>
&gt; there would be one singel user wanting to use something not totlaly <b=
r>
&gt; ai-driven?<br>
&gt; reactos was ment as a user-project, like ubuntu for many users as thei=
r <br>
&gt; desktop os. now it is just some fun for a few devs resulting in nothin=
g <br>
&gt; usable after 20 years. what is the idea behind this? if i was the <br>
&gt; maintainer of this project i would state this:<br>
&gt; we can do 2 things: 1. work hard and build version 1.0 in 5 years from=
 now<br>
&gt; or 2. stoop this waste of time of running behind the facts and having =
to <br>
&gt; rebuild it everytime agian because the project goes to slow for hardwa=
re <br>
&gt; it is written for to end up in a museum before somethign happens.<br>
&gt; as an end-user i am highly disappointed in this project.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt; Ros-dev mailing list<br>
&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">Ros-dev@react=
os.org</a><br>
&gt; <a href=3D"http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev" rel=3D"norefer=
rer" target=3D"_blank">http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Ros-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]=
g</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev" rel=3D"noreferrer" =
target=3D"_blank">http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>

--000000000000a3f22a05baee43d4--


--===============0837451196210258428==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

--===============0837451196210258428==--