Re: Power supply efficiency on older model Sun equipment
"D G Teed" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.solaris.at-home |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Robert Chase <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmmm, > > <sarcasm> > I certainly hope it would beat the Ultra 60 considering its a 1998 vintage > system. Thats the part I always find amusing. People comparing a ten year > old Sun with a brand new PC. > I wonder how the PC would fair against a > Sunfire V445 with raided SAS disks? Would be more fair than comparing 10 What they are comparing is what they can afford. Its logical. If given the choice of buying a 10 year old Lexus or a 5 year old Toyota I'll take the Toyota. People only find themselves making those comparisons because they are concerned with cost and family budget. When you find a V445 with 320GB SAS for $500 let me know. I can't afford the "quality" and capacities both. In my perspective it is a choice of saving money, not the glory of building a dynasty of computing or building a mission critical solution to run at home. I'm making a choice to run with the lowest total cost for a home server. That choice was once to use the free Sun hardware that is no longer suited for my workplace, or to locate deals on Sun equipment on eBay. On second thoughts I'm abandoning that. It goes for IBM hardware they discard too. I'm sorry if my priorities have rained on your luxurious (from my budget viewpoint) standards. --Donald