Re: Which Linux distribution for a SparcStation20?
der Mouse <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.solaris.at-home |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Question to those who mentioned running BSD on their sparc32 boxes: > For what reasons did/would you choose BSD over Solaris on a sparc? Did? Because it was open source, which Solaris wasn't. Do? NetBSD (my favourite BSD), as compared to Solaris: - Is substantially more familiar. (Admittedly a historical reason.) - Runs on far more heterogenous hardware. (I have sparc32, sparc64, i386, macppc, shark, hpcmips...of those, only two are supported by OpenSolaris according totheir webpages.) - Has substantially saner licenses. - Is opener; anything that has to resort to tacking "open" onto its name generally isn't. OpenSolaris appears to be largely still owned by Sun. - Has drunk substantially less of the "the Web is the only interface anyone needs" kool-aid. (Using the Web is difficult and unpleasant for me, and there are few surer ways to keep me from more than glancing at something than to give it naught but a Web interface.) > ([...] those running BSD also made a decision of not running Solaris) Personally, only in the sense that I also made a decision of not running any of the various other things that run on the SPARC. At the time I started, NetBSD was, as far as I could tell, the only open-source OS for the SPARC. Now, cross-platform compatability cuts just about everything else out. However, NetBSD is nosing over into a power-dive (personal opinion), and it's not at all clear I'll still be running it for that much longer. As yet I have no idea what I may be using instead. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML [email protected] / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B