Re: HME and IPX
Simon Fryer <[email protected]> Fri, 5 Aug 2011 08:53:05 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.solaris.at-home |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALWqHC1f3S0ZeeKrFv=6a5UEhzB_rjt+-DWsOVJ8jJnt_M7G_Q@mail.gmail.com> |
On 5 August 2011 01:33, Mouse <[email protected]> wrote: >>> While we are discussing IPX's. I quick review of the BSD's >>> (Open/Net) indicate that there is no support for the HME 100MB sbus >>> ethernet interface on the 4c platform. >> How do you come to this conclusion? > > I don't know (I didn't write that), but... > >> hme(4) is in the default (GENERIC) kernel configuration: > > ...that doesn't mean much. At least on Net, the kernel config is > shared between 4, 4c, and 4m, so anything supported on any of them > needs to be present. In Open it appears that the GENERIC kernel supports 4, 4c and 4m but there is also a separate config files for each of the individual platforms if required. The HME interface only appears in GENERIC and the 4m config files. >> There may be a hardware or firmware incompatibility, that makes it >> impossible to use a HME in a sun4c. > > Don't forget, the kernel doesn't probe the sbus; it depends on OBP to > have done that - autoconf just walks the OBP device tree. So if the > OBP on the machine doesn't recognize it at least enough to get it into > the device tree, the kernel won't do anything with it. I didn't realise that. Thanks. > At least that's how Net works. Dunno if Open has reworked sparc > autoconf enough to have changed that. I doubt it. It sounds as though reworking autoconf would be a non trivial task and I don't think OpenBSD sparc has changed all that much recently. Simon -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Well, an engineer is not concerned with the truth; that is left to philosophers and theologians: the prime concern of an engineer is the utility of the final product." Lectures on the Electrical Properties of Materials, L.Solymar, D.Walsh