Re: Firefox
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:07:36 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.solaris.at-home |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:55:57 +0200 > From: "E. Groenenberg" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Suns-at-Home] Firefox >> I have installed Firefox 7.0 on an Ultra-2 running Solaris 10. It runs >> like a drain, using 100% of a cpu for long periods of time with little = >> to >> show for it. Pstack shows a stack of incredible depth, most of the >> routines having something to do with "reflow". Their support site has >> vague mentions of some graphics cards which might not be playing well. > Well, funny that you mentioned it. I'm using FF7 on build 129 of Open > Solaris and just performs as one would expect (Ultra-27, nvdia FX card, > office machine). > While at home (Ultra-20 also with Nvidia FX) I'm using Solaris 10 with > FF7 and it slows down from performing proper to the speed of a snail > during a weeks usage. You mean you left FF7 running continuously for a week? So presumably = restarting it put it back to normal? In that case it is not the problem I am seeing, since mine starts off = running slow. I need to do a bit more debugging to see exactly what it = thinks it is doing. Does anyone know what sort of fancy things Firefox might be asking the = Creator Graphics (or any other FB) to do? It certsinly seems to demand a = vast collection of graphis-related libraries to be available. The sites = that seemed worst were Firefox's own help pages. -- = Charles=A0H.=A0Lindsey=A0---------At=A0Home,=A0doing=A0my=A0own=A0thing----= -------------------- Tel:=A0+44=A0161=A0436=A06131=A0 = =A0=A0=A0Web:=A0http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email:[email protected]=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Snail:=A05=A0Clerewood=A0Ave= ,=A0CHEADLE,=A0SK8=A03JU,=A0U.K. PGP:=A02C15F1A9=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Fingerprint:=A073=A06D=A0C2=A051=A093=A0A0= =A001=A0E7=A065=A0E8=A064=A07E=A014=A0A4=A0AB=A0A5