Summary: Disk Partitions and AdvFS
"Garsha, Adam" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.tru64.managers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Overwhelming support for using a single LUN per AdvFS Domain and for using the "c" partition (i.e. whole disk approach) vs. using multiple partitions across multiple domains to achieve best performance. Since we have an EVA and since we have the AdvFS Utilities license (both of which make it pretty trivial to correct this), I am going to move forward with the slow march to get all of our Oracle domains running on independent whole LUNs. Benefits will include: -- performance -- easier to determine where I/O is coming from (which apps) -- easier to manage since I will then be able to increase LUN size at EVA level -- sets us up for being able to use SAN level snaps without going mad with complexity/dependencies Thanks all, for your quick responses and consideration! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Original question: Is there any good reason to carve up partitions to utilize with AdvFS domains vs. using 1 whole disk partition per domain? i.e. foo_domain -> dsk75a bar_domain -> dsk75b car_domain -> dsk75d ... vs. foo_domain -> dsk76c bar_domain -> dsk77c car_domain -> dsk78c We have a system set up to utilize partitions vs. the whole disk approach. It seems like a bad idea to me (i.e. it seems better to me to do all partitioning at the SAN level). Is there any good reason to do it using partitions at the OS disk level? Thanks. Adam Garsha Systems Engineer Marquette University IT Services 414-288-3750 (Office) 414-235-0112 (Cell) [email protected]