Grow, peak or plateau - the outlook for car travel
Simon Field <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Jul 2014 08:44:37 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.activism.carfree-network |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
---946655441-231798418-1405323877=:70954 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This may be of interest. Best regards, Simon. ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Glenn Lyons <Glenn.Lyons-8lHrkcC6s/[email protected]> To: [email protected]=20 Sent: Monday, 14 July 2014, 7:11 Subject: [UTSG] Grow, peak or plateau - the outlook for car travel =20 Dear colleagues, Apologies for cross-posting. Those of you interested in the evidence and debates surrounding 'peak car' = may find the article 'Grow, peak or plateau - the outlook for car travel' h= elpful. The article provides a detailed written account of a roundtable dis= cussion on the topic which took place in London on 20 May 2014. It is now a= vailable at: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/23277/ The summary is included below. Please let me know if you are aware of other= emerging examinations of the uncertainties facing future demand for car tr= avel. Best wishes, Glenn ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------- Summary At the request of the New Zealand Ministry of Transport, a meeting of UK re= searchers and commentators was convened in London on 'peak car', a hypothes= is that per capita car use is close to its maximum level, and may stabilise= or turn down. In both countries car traffic forecasts have been overestima= ted, though current official thinking is that recent levelling off and decl= ine in car use is a temporary result of poor economic conditions, and that = a resumption of strong growth is expected in future. Research findings incl= ude features that may show evidence of structural changes in the influence = of economic and other drivers of car travel, and/or demand reaching natural= saturation levels where further growth gives little benefit to travellers.= The discussion reflected diverse experience and judgements, not all in agr= eement, and mostly related to UK experience, though influenced by a growing= international research literature, mostly empirical in focus, showing some important similarities in many other countries. Key features = included: . There have been strongly divergent trends in different locations (the mai= n areas of decline being in cities, with growth continuing in many lower de= nsity areas) and among different groups (young men showing a decline, women= an increase), with noticeable differences by journey purpose, length and m= ode (rail use has grown strongly at the same time as car use has fallen). A= s a result the trends in national aggregate totals have been damped, not fu= lly revealing underlying causes, and disaggregate experience has varied not= only in size but also in direction of change.=20 . At the aggregate level, evidence of shifts in demand predates recent econ= omic difficulties, including decoupling of traffic growth and economic grow= th, reductions in propensity to learn to drive, changing land use and migra= tion trends (which had previously been dominated by movements to areas enco= uraging higher car use, and in the 2000s reversed), growth of internet use,= and decline in traffic levels in London and some other urban areas. These = shifts have mostly been observed in the 1990s and early 2000s, including pe= riods of strong economic growth. . Over the same period, there have been changes in transport policy and tra= vel conditions favouring public transport, walking and cycling in some plac= es, changes in tax effects on prices (especially company car use), parking = control, congestion levels, and fuel prices. It has often been the case tha= t policy changes, though worthy, are deemed to have rather small effects on= travel demand, but there is a view that the cumulative effects may have be= en larger than expected, the resulting car use levels representing a new eq= uilibrium to the prevailing conditions.=A0=20 Taken together, these features would imply that per capita car use is influ= enced by both economic and other structural factors, cannot be converted to= total traffic levels simply by multiplying by population, and demands seri= ous re-examination. Although all these features are researchable, there is = not currently a professional consensus backing either the official forecast= s or any specific alternative, and a strong implication is that methods of = policy formulation and project design should test robustness to a much wide= r span of feasible futures than is reflected by traditional methods involvi= ng rather narrow bands of statistical uncertainty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------- Professor Glenn Lyons Associate Dean (Research and Knowledge Exchange) and Professor of Transport= and Society Faculty of Environment and Technology, University of the West of England, F= renchay Campus. BRISTOL BS16 1QY --=20 --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "World Carfree Network" group. To post to this group, send email to carfree_network-/[email protected] Replies are sent to the author of the message. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to carfree_network-unsubscribe-/[email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/carfree_network?hl=3Den?hl=3Den ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= World Carfree Network" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to carfree_network+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/[email protected] For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ---946655441-231798418-1405323877=:70954 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html><body><div style=3D"color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:ar= ial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div><span>This may be of intere= st.</span></div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 13.3333px; fo= nt-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-= style: normal;"><br><span></span></div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); f= ont-size: 13.3333px; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; background-co= lor: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span>Best regards,</span></div><div= style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 13.3333px; font-family: arial,hel= vetica,sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><br>= <span></span></div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 13.3333px;= font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; background-color: transparent; fo= nt-style: normal;"><span>Simon.</span></div><br><div style=3D"font-family: = arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"> <div style=3D"font-family:= times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div dir=3D"ltr"> --= --- Forwarded Message -----<br> <font face=3D"Arial" size=3D"2"> <b><span = style=3D"font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Glenn Lyons <Glenn.Lyons@UW= E.AC.UK><br> <b><span style=3D"font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> UTSG@J= ISCMAIL.AC.UK <br> <b><span style=3D"font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> M= onday, 14 July 2014, 7:11<br> <b><span style=3D"font-weight: bold;">Subject= :</span></b> [UTSG] Grow, peak or plateau - the outlook for car travel<br> = </font> </div> <div class=3D"y_msg_container"><br>Dear colleagues,<br><br>A= pologies for cross-posting.<br><br>Those of you interested in the evidence = and debates surrounding 'peak car' may find the article 'Grow, peak or plat= eau - the outlook for car travel' helpful. The article provides a detailed = written account of a roundtable discussion on the topic which took place in= London on 20 May 2014. It is now available at: <a href=3D"http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/23277/" target=3D"_blank">http://eprints.= uwe.ac.uk/23277/</a><br><br>The summary is included below. Please let me kn= ow if you are aware of other emerging examinations of the uncertainties fac= ing future demand for car travel.<br><br>Best wishes,<br><br>Glenn<br><br>-= ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------<br><br>Summary<br><br>At the request of the New Zealand Mini= stry of Transport, a meeting of UK researchers and commentators was convene= d in London on 'peak car', a hypothesis that per capita car use is close to= its maximum level, and may stabilise or turn down. In both countries car t= raffic forecasts have been overestimated, though current official thinking = is that recent levelling off and decline in car use is a temporary result o= f poor economic conditions, and that a resumption of strong growth is expec= ted in future. Research findings include features that may show evidence of structural changes in the influence of economic and other drivers of ca= r travel, and/or demand reaching natural saturation levels where further gr= owth gives little benefit to travellers. The discussion reflected diverse e= xperience and judgements, not all in agreement, and mostly related to UK ex= perience, though influenced by a growing international research literature,= mostly empirical in focus, showing some important similarities in many oth= er countries. Key features included:<br><br>. There have been strongly dive= rgent trends in different locations (the main areas of decline being in cit= ies, with growth continuing in many lower density areas) and among differen= t groups (young men showing a decline, women an increase), with noticeable = differences by journey purpose, length and mode (rail use has grown strongl= y at the same time as car use has fallen). As a result the trends in nation= al aggregate totals have been damped, not fully revealing underlying causes, and disaggregate experience has varied not only in size but also i= n direction of change. <br><br>. At the aggregate level, evidence of shifts= in demand predates recent economic difficulties, including decoupling of t= raffic growth and economic growth, reductions in propensity to learn to dri= ve, changing land use and migration trends (which had previously been domin= ated by movements to areas encouraging higher car use, and in the 2000s rev= ersed), growth of internet use, and decline in traffic levels in London and= some other urban areas. These shifts have mostly been observed in the 1990= s and early 2000s, including periods of strong economic growth.<br><br>. Ov= er the same period, there have been changes in transport policy and travel = conditions favouring public transport, walking and cycling in some places, = changes in tax effects on prices (especially company car use), parking cont= rol, congestion levels, and fuel prices. It has often been the case that policy changes, though worthy, are deemed to have rather small effect= s on travel demand, but there is a view that the cumulative effects may hav= e been larger than expected, the resulting car use levels representing a ne= w equilibrium to the prevailing conditions. <br><br>Taken together, t= hese features would imply that per capita car use is influenced by both eco= nomic and other structural factors, cannot be converted to total traffic le= vels simply by multiplying by population, and demands serious re-examinatio= n. Although all these features are researchable, there is not currently a p= rofessional consensus backing either the official forecasts or any specific= alternative, and a strong implication is that methods of policy formulatio= n and project design should test robustness to a much wider span of feasibl= e futures than is reflected by traditional methods involving rather narrow = bands of statistical uncertainty.<br><br>------------------------------------------------------= ------------------------------------<br><br><br>Professor Glenn Lyons<br>As= sociate Dean (Research and Knowledge Exchange) and Professor of Transport a= nd Society<br>Faculty of Environment and Technology, University of the West= of England, Frenchay Campus. BRISTOL BS16 1QY<br></div> </div> </div> </d= iv></body></html> <p></p> -- <br /> -- <br /> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google<br /> Groups "World Carfree Network" group.<br /> To post to this group, send email to carfree_network-/[email protected]<br /> Replies are sent to the author of the message.<br /> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to<br /> carfree_network-unsubscribe-/[email protected]<br /> For more options, visit this group at<br /> <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/carfree_network?hl=3Den?hl=3Den">= http://groups.google.com/group/carfree_network?hl=3Den?hl=3Den</a><br /> --- <br /> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;World Carfree Network" group.<br /> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to <a href=3D"mailto:carfree_network+unsubscribe-/[email protected]">car= free_network+unsubscribe-/[email protected]</a>.<br /> For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br /> ---946655441-231798418-1405323877=:70954--