[rad-green] Motivation to impeach Trump is about control of Democratic Party

*https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/2019/11/07/motivation-to-impeach-trump-is-about-control-of-democratic-party.html
<https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/2019/11/07/motivation-to-impeach-trump-is-about-control-of-democratic-party.html>Toronto
Star          Nov. 7, 2019*




*Motivation to impeach Trump is about control of Democratic PartyBy Rick
SalutinContributing Columnist*

The Trump impeachment frenzy in the U.S. among Democrats, especially by
party heavies like Nancy Pelosi, makes zero sense on its face.

First, there’s no chance they’ll succeed: they’ll impeach (i.e. charge) him
in the House and fail to convict in the Republican Senate. Why waste
resources on losing instead of building a credible, vote-garnering
alternative.

It’s not about healing divisions, since this will make those far deeper.

It’s a dreadful issue to base an impeachment on: Trump’s klutzy efforts to
bully Ukraine’s president into providing dirt on potential rival Joe Biden.
It’s obscure and distant (Ukraine!). What’s a good impeachment issue?
Organizing a seedy criminal burglary (Watergate) from the White House —
which was the case for Nixon’s impeachment. Or having sex with a young
woman in the oval office (Clinton). People can relate. Those are gripping,
titillating and comprehensible.

Plus, an election’s a year off. Why not beat him there and avoid issues of
legitimacy? Nixon and Clinton were both impeached right after elections.
That timing made sense, it was the only expedient way to dump them.

Some say it is about that, they’re trying to cripple Trump for the
election. But this will just entrench voters on both sides, it won’t move a
single ballot.

Pelosi’s a special mystery. She held out against impeachment for three
years. Then along comes a Ukrainian sideshow and she’s all in? Spare me.

What shifted her now? I’d say the answer is: this impeachment isn’t
directed at Trump at all, it’s about undermining the rising left-wing
opposition in the Democratic party. They are plausibly on the verge of
seizing the party agenda away from the neo-liberal consensus of the
Clinton-Obama decades — with issues like universal public health-care and
equitable taxes. They’ve even found ways to fund campaigns without bowing
to the corporate gods.

Bernie Sanders scared the crap out of them in 2015. He was nobody, and
worse, a socialist! But Hillary Clinton beat him back, even if Trump beat
her. Some things are worse than losing elections. Then, instead of going
away, Bernie stayed at it — and proliferated! He has a sibling in Elizabeth
Warren and acolytes in “the squad.” He raises more money than anyone — in
dribs and drabs.

This is their nightmare. They threw Joe Biden at “the left” but he’s flawed
and fading. They tried others: Beto, Kamala Harris, Mayor Pete. So far,
nothing but single digits. And If you combine Warren and Sanders, as you
should, you get about double Biden’s support. They think, OK, if necessary,
we can live with Warren. So they shift focus: control the agenda, not the
choice of candidate. Turn the discussion into all impeachment, all the
time. Pelosi’s on it.

Does this mean party bosses would rather lose control of the country and
presidency than cede power in their party? Absolutely. Look at the U.K.
Labour party right now. With an election on and leftist Corbyn as leader,
MPs who were incubated in the neo-liberal Blair years are in full turncoat
mode. The deputy leader just quit. Ex-Blairite MPs urge people to vote for
Boris! It’s the way of power. You’d like to win elections but you couldn’t
bear losing your sanctuary.

So Pelosi said: “What are you thinking? ... Remember November,” as she
“unloaded on progressive policies.” A poll showing Trump still
“competitive” in swing states, led to “freaking out” among centrist Dems
like the columnist who wrote
<https://www.thedailybeast.com/if-democrats-arent-panicking-they-arent-paying-attention>,
“If Democrats aren’t panicking, they aren’t paying attention.”

Let me object to myself: Look, the first impeachment calls came from the
party’s left, like congresswoman Rashida Tlaib and Warren. But those calls
were emotional and ideological.

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sid-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sid-l/CACKppcw-%2B3iCnGPJa-wu%2BYgHFx%3Dg_BQDd%2BMZ8xMSjQsU8D37SQ%40mail.gmail.com.

---
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
List help: <https://riseup.net/lists>