[rad-green] B.C. subsidizes fossil fuels to tune of hundreds of millions annually, according to study

"Sid Shniad" (via rad-green Mailing List) <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.politics.communism.environmental
Message-ID <CACKppcxnDpSdqpSy28egsFFumVXmEB_ww7u5n6HATY0FJt2zRw@mail.gmail.com>
*https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/b-c-subsidizes-fossil-fuels-to-tune-of-hundreds-of-millions-annually-according-to-study
<https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/b-c-subsidizes-fossil-fuels-to-tune-of-hundreds-of-millions-annually-according-to-study>*









*Vancouver Sun          November 25, 2019B.C. subsidizes fossil fuels to
tune of hundreds of millions annually, according to study"I knew that there
were subsidies. I had no idea that we were literally giving up billions of
dollars …" — Tzeporah Berman, the International Program Director at
advocacy group Stand.earthBy Matt Robinson*

B.C.’s provincial government provided at least $830 million in subsidies in
2017-18 for the production and consumption of fossil fuels, according to a
new report out of the International Institute for Sustainable Development.

The province’s subsidies are complicated and extensive, often overlooked
and not always transparent, and they amount to hundreds of millions of
dollars in public cash annually in support of activities that contribute to
climate change, the authors of the report found.

Vanessa Corkal, one of the authors of the study, titled Locked In and
Losing Out, explained that the report took on B.C. not to single out the
province, but rather to get a full sense of the types of provincial fossil
fuel subsidies that exist in Canada and that effectively hold back the
country’s ability to move forward on its climate goals.

“Much like in the Paris Agreement we need all countries to work together,
in Canada we need all provinces and territories to work together with the
federal government to deal with this issue,” Corkal said Sunday.

“As long as fossil fuel subsidies exist, it’s going to hold us back from
really making lots of progress on climate change.”

B.C.’s subsidies take the form of provincial tax exemptions, royalty
reductions, and direct spending commitments, the report found.

Royalty credit programs, which reduce the amount of cash companies must pay
to the government, account for the majority of the subsidies, according to
the report. In 2018-19, the total amount of allowable royalty reductions
hit $631 million, it found. That was up from $447 million in the prior
fiscal year. In all, B.C. has at least $2.6 to $3.2 billion in outstanding
royalty credits from fossil fuel producers, according to the report.

In 2017-18, at least $268 million in fossil fuel subsidies came through
provincial tax exemptions, according to the study. A large proportion of
those subsidies were directed at consumers, but others benefited producers.
B.C. also provided direct spending supports for compressed natural gas, LNG
and even coal mining, according to the authors.

The report included as an annex a four-page list of other provincial fossil
fuel subsidies that the authors could not quantify due to lack of publicly
available data.

Tzeporah Berman, the International Program Director at advocacy group
Stand.earth, said she was surprised by the amount of subsidies the province
was providing and shocked that they had increased under the NDP-Green
coalition government.

“I track these issues every day. I follow these issues and have been for
years. I knew that there were subsidies. I had no idea that we were
literally giving up billions of dollars that could be spent in B.C. towards
transportation or education or housing in order to support the growth of
the most polluting industries,” she said Sunday.

Berman said her group planned to send copies of the report to every MLA in
the province and to request meetings with the government.

Fossil fuel subsidies run counter to provincial policies that seek to
reduce B.C.’s production of greenhouse gases, and they come at a cost to
other programs and industries, according to the report.

“They pull vital government resources away from effective climate change
strategies, not to mention other important priorities such as healthcare
and education. This means that other sectors of the economy must compensate
for the vast amounts of government revenue spent on subsidies — which is
neither fair nor efficient,” it stated.

The authors made several recommendations, including publicly releasing all
data related to government spending on fossil fuel subsidies each year.
They also recommended the government create an action plan to end the
subsidies, coordinate its subsidy reform efforts with the federal
government, and avoid creating new ones.

[email protected]

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sid-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sid-l/CACKppcxnDpSdqpSy28egsFFumVXmEB_ww7u5n6HATY0FJt2zRw%40mail.gmail.com.

---
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
List help: <https://riseup.net/lists>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.