[rad-green] The Infallible Warrior: Honest Reflections on the Legacy of Yasser Arafat 15 Years after his Death

*http://www.palestinechronicle.com/the-infallible-warrior-honest-reflections-on-the-legacy-of-yasser-arafat-15-years-after-his-death/
<http://www.palestinechronicle.com/the-infallible-warrior-honest-reflections-on-the-legacy-of-yasser-arafat-15-years-after-his-death/>*

*Palestine Chronicle          November 21, 2019*

The Infallible Warrior: Honest Reflections on the Legacy of Yasser Arafat
15 Years after his Death
<http://www.palestinechronicle.com/2019/11/>
Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, US President Bill Clinton, and PLO
Chairman Yasser Arafat at the signing of the Oslo Accord. (Photo: via MEMO)

*By Ramzy Baroud <http://www.palestinechronicle.com/writers/ramzy-baroud>*

15 years after the passing of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, the
Palestinian people continue to reflect on his legacy. Thousands of images
of “Abu Ammar” have been shared across numerous social media platforms
remembering a man whose nom de guerre has been affiliated with the
Palestinian struggle for decades.

Arafat’s legacy, however, is a contentious subject. The deep sense of
loyalty that many Palestinians feel towards him is admirable but also
worrying. This creates a dilemma: how is one to honestly dissect the
history of a man whose status, among many Palestinians, has been elevated
to that of an infallible warrior?

Considering that this current Palestinian generation is suffering the
consequences of a checkered past – one that was partly moulded by Arafat
himself – examining Abu Ammar’s successes and failures is more critical
than ever before.

One can honestly say that it was Arafat and his generation of Palestinian
leaders and intellectuals who helped resurrect the Palestinian national
identity after the humiliating Arab defeat by Israel in the June 1967 war.
Prior to that date, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) was neither
truly Palestinian nor a genuinely revolutionary force.

Moreover, Arafat, throughout the 1960s and 70s used the party he founded,
Fatah, and the PLO to establish a large array of global alliances
throughout the Southern hemisphere. This made the image of Arafat, adorned
with his black and white Palestinian keffiyeh, a recognizable brand from
Chile to South Africa, and from Iran to China.

But Arafat is also responsible for many of the ailments that continue to
plague Palestinian society and hamper the Palestinian cause until this day.
In fact, much of the widespread corruption, failures and absence of
democratically run institutions in Palestine are rooted in the very system
of political patronage created by the late Palestinian leader.

From the onset, back in the mid-1960s, Arafat and a small clique of Fatah
members tried to dominate the PLO and by extension, all Palestinian
national and political institutions, including the Palestine National
Council (PNC) and the PLO’s Executive Committee. The former served as a
Palestinian parliament in exile and the latter became the executive branch
of a government-like structure. While Arafat assigned to himself most of
the top positions, his allies were strategically allocated in all branches
of Palestinian political life.

Under Arafat, the PLO operated according to the most minimal standards of
democracy. Throughout his political career, whether in exile or following
his return to Gaza in 1994, he labored to appear politically inclusive. In
reality, Arafat shrewdly managed all Palestinian political affairs without
any margins for meaningful dissent. Under immense American and Israeli
pressure, Arafat and his Palestinian Authority cracked down on all
Palestinian political parties that rejected the PA’s subservience to Israel
and its “peace at all costs” approach.

Unlike the current leader of the PA and PLO, Mahmoud Abbas, Arafat, at
least, was genuine in his desire to establish Palestinian political unity.
However the unity he envisaged seemed to imply a united Palestinian front
behind him and the political agenda of his choosing.

Palestinians continue to suffer the consequences of this misconstrued
notion of ‘unity’, agreeing to a singular political agenda, as opposed to
uniting within a single democratic political institution. Arafat could
neither achieve the former nor secure the latter.

The shortcomings in Arafat’s legacy became even more amplified after his
death. With no true democratic institutions that would permit Palestinians
to sort out their many differences, Abbas, Arafat’s heir to the PA/PLO
throne, used his position to accumulate wealth, prop up his cronies, and
insist on his complete dominance over all Palestinian affairs.

On numerous occasions, Arafat dared to challenge Israel. His besiegement in
his office in Ramallah for years, prior to his death from a “mysterious
blood disorder” was a testimony to Israel’s loathing of the Palestinian
leader. However, it was the skewed political structure that Arafat created
that emboldened the aging Abbas in his drive for political supremacy.
Indeed, Abbas has single-handedly squandered all Palestinian national
achievements, including the PLO itself as a unifying Palestinian political
platform.

15 years later, it has become clear that the lack of a meaningful
Palestinian political dialogue under Arafat led to the weakening,
fragility, and systematic dissolution of the Palestinian national project.
If Arafat had allowed for the development of a healthy Palestinian
democracy, the Oslo agreement would have never been signed in the first
place. Thanks to Oslo, Palestinians are now as trapped in a political maze
of unfulfilled agreements and broken promises as they are also imprisoned
behind Israeli walls, fences and checkpoints. While the vast majority of
Palestinians continue to reel under this horrific Oslo-induced reality,
Abbas, the Fatah, and PA elites enjoy the perks of their acquiescence and
outright betrayal of the Palestinian people.

Arafat, despite all of his political miscalculations, is still missed in
Palestine 15 years following his death. This truth is a commentary on
today’s sad state of affairs. What’s most ironic however, is that today’s
tragic reality is, in many ways, the direct outcome of Arafat’s own legacy.

*– Dr. Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and editor of The Palestine
Chronicle. His last book is The Last Earth: A Palestinian Story (Pluto
Press, London) and his forthcoming book is These Chains Will Be Broken:
Palestinian Stories of Struggle and Defiance in Israeli Prisons (Clarity
Press, Atlanta). Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the
Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA), Istanbul Zaim University (IZU).
His website is www.ramzybaroud.net <http://www.ramzybaroud.net>.*

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sid-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sid-l/CACKppcz5w9wiE-GjoCzJ1cK_kWws6MWxi4p6bu_GGCwUH87scQ%40mail.gmail.com.

---
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
List help: <https://riseup.net/lists>