Re: Filling a vacated seat using STV
Luděk Belán via Election-Methods <[email protected]> Thu, 09 Apr 2026 02:43:04 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.election-methods |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you, but in your example, with the Droop quota (specifically quota 34) I also get candidate C as the new winner, yet the second winner comes out as candidate D or B because they have the same number of votes. With the Hare quota, the new winners are candidates C and B; thus candidate A would be replaced by candidate C. And is it possible to find a counterexample for the unrounded Hare quota? Luděk Belán ---------- Původní e‑mail ---------- Od: Ross Hyman <[email protected]> Komu: Luděk Belán <[email protected]> Kopie: [email protected] Datum: 9. 4. 2026 0:59:36 Předmět: Re: [EM] Filling a vacated seat using STV "35: A > C > D 33 B > C 17 C > D 15 D > B Two winners: A and B win. Exclude A: C and D win. On Wed, Apr 8, 2026 at 5:27 PM Luděk Belán via Election-Methods <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > does anyone happen to know whether the STV method can be used to fill a vacated seat by recalculating the original vote while simply excluding the candidate who took that vacated seat? Could a situation arise where this recalculation would cause someone else to lose their seat? > Thank you. > > Kind regards > > Luděk Belán > ---- > Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list info " ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list info