Re: a solution to the by-election problem?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm via Election-Methods <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Apr 2026 12:21:03 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.election-methods |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-04-20 23:39, Ross Hyman via Election-Methods wrote: > Hi all, > > The by-election problem is the following: > Starting with a Droop compliant solution for the M-winner problem, > exclude one of the M winners. Now determine a new set of M-winners > that includes the M-1 remaining previous winners and is also Droop > compliant. There is no STV method that does this. Either you preserve > Droop compliance but not all the M-1 previous winners are reelected, > or you protect the M-1 previous winners from exclusion and the new Mth > winner is not guaranteed to be Droop compliant. Don't combinatorial methods lke Schulze STV or CPO-STV do this? Do the Condorcet election with every superset of the (M-1) winners that have already been elected. Pick the winner according to the pairwise method. Or can they still work themself into a corner they can't get out of? -km ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list info