Re: Level of proportionality for two-seat PR methods
Toby Pereira via Election-Methods <[email protected]> Sat, 13 Jun 2026 17:01:23 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.election-methods |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============6909060544768956814==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_4047900_1359247322.1781370083813"
------=_Part_4047900_1359247322.1781370083813
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sorry - the formula for the lower extreme point would be=C2=A02q - 0.5. Fo=
r the higher extreme point, it would be 1 minus that, so 1.5 - 2q.
Toby
On Saturday, 13 June 2026 at 17:57:07 BST, Toby Pereira <tdp201b@yahoo.=
co.uk> wrote: =20
=20
For n seats and a 0 to 1 scale for candidate positions, for your Spatial =
Droop proportionality, the candidates would be at 1/(n+1), 2/(n+1), ... , n=
/(n+1). And for independent wings (if they're still called wings with multi=
ple seats), it would be 0.5/n, 1.5/n, ... , (n-0.5)/n. Bloc majoritarian wo=
uld still be with them all in the middle.
So in the general case for Spatial Droop q is 1/(n+1) rather than specifica=
lly 1/3.
As for the overall formula, you can see it as looking for the mid-points in=
the cells given n equal-sized cells (for n seats), but with different extr=
eme points for the far left and far right cell.
So in the 2-candidate case:
When q =3D 1/4, the extreme points are just 0 and 1When q =3D 1/3, the extr=
eme points are 1/6 and 5/6When q =3D 1/2, the extreme points are 1/2 and 1/=
2 (the cells have no size, forcing everything into the middle)
In the general case:
The extreme points for wings would always be 0 and 1The extreme points for =
Droop would be 1/(2(n+1)) and 1-1/(2(n+1))The extreme points for majoritari=
an would always both be 1/2
q for the "wings" position is 1/(2n)q for Droop is 1/(n+1)q for majoritaria=
n is 1/2
I think the formula for the extreme points would be 2q - 0.5 for a 0 to 1 s=
cale.
Some of this might make sense.
Toby
On Saturday, 13 June 2026 at 01:54:18 BST, Kristofer Munsterhjelm via E=
lection-Methods <[email protected]> wrote: =20
=20
As mentioned in my previous post, I extended my PR measuring code to=20
consider different degrees of proportionality.
I haven't found a way to generalize proportionality degrees for any=20
number of seats (I should read that post, I suppose...) but for two=20
seats, I figured that it's not too hard. Since the voter opinion space=20
distribution is a standard normal, it's symmetric around zero, so=20
there's no reason for the method to prefer left-wing to right-wing=20
candidates (or vice versa). Thus, the proportionality level can be=20
parameterized by just how far from the median the two elected candidates=20
lie.
That is, the error function is
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 sqrt((x_1 - y_1)^2 + (x_2 - y_2)^2)
and can be parameterized by a quantile level q, so that y_1 is the=20
position corresponding to the qth quantile of the voter opinion space=20
distribution, and y_2 is the (1-q)th quantile; and x_1 and x_2 is the=20
location of the leftmost and rightmost elected candidate in opinion space.
The "significant" values of q, or at least those that come most readily=20
to mind as distinct, are, for two seats:
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 q =3D 0
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 as factional as possible, usually not=
a good idea, but perhaps useful=20
for the unanimity setting I mentioned earlier.
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 q =3D 1/4
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 This is the "independent wings" posit=
ion, where to elect a council,=20
you split the voters into two halves (left-of-center and=20
right-of-center) and elect the centrist from each (i.e. the=20
left-wingers' internal median and the right-wingers' internal median).=20
The median is at q =3D 1/2, so a median of the left half is 1/4.
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 q =3D 1/3
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Spatial Droop proportionality.
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 q =3D 1/2
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Bloc majoritarian voting (elect as ma=
ny median voter candidates as you=20
can).
The VSE is then a goodness-of-fit value (and is the maximum VSE that=20
method can get at any q, grid search optimization inaccuracies=20
notwithstanding). A low value means that even the best fit doesn't fit=20
very well, and thus that the method has trouble being consistently=20
proportional at any level. High values mean that the particular fit is a=20
very good one.
-km
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list info
=20
------=_Part_4047900_1359247322.1781370083813
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><head></head><body><div class=3D"ydp6a945978yahoo-style-wrap" style=
=3D"font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px=
;"><div></div>
<div dir=3D"ltr" data-setdir=3D"false">Sorry - the formula for the =
lower extreme point would be <span><span style=3D"color: rgb(38, 40, 4=
2); font-family: Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">2q - 0.5. F=
or the higher extreme point, it would be 1 minus that, so 1.5 - 2q.</span><=
/span></div><div dir=3D"ltr" data-setdir=3D"false"><span><span style=3D"col=
or: rgb(38, 40, 42); font-family: Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-se=
rif;"><br></span></span></div><div dir=3D"ltr" data-setdir=3D"false"><span>=
<span style=3D"color: rgb(38, 40, 42); font-family: Helvetica Neue, Helveti=
ca, Arial, sans-serif;">Toby</span></span></div><div><br></div>
=20
</div><div id=3D"ydp43ecad98yahoo_quoted_1650295562" class=3D"ydp43=
ecad98yahoo_quoted">
<div style=3D"font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, s=
ans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;">
=20
<div>
On Saturday, 13 June 2026 at 17:57:07 BST, Toby Per=
eira <[email protected]> wrote:
</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
=20
=20
<div><div id=3D"ydp43ecad98yiv1013994983"><div><div style=
=3D"font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px=
;" class=3D"ydp43ecad98yiv1013994983ydp56533b20yahoo-style-wrap"><div></div=
>
<div dir=3D"ltr"><span><span style=3D"color:rgb(0, 0, 0);font-famil=
y:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">For n seats and a 0 to 1 s=
cale for candidate positions, for your Spatial Droop proportionality, the c=
andidates would be at 1/(n+1), 2/(n+1), ... , n/(n+1). And for independent =
wings (if they're still called wings with multiple seats), it would be 0.5/=
n, 1.5/n, ... , (n-0.5)/n. Bloc majoritarian would still be with them all i=
n the middle.</span></span><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><span><span style=3D"=
color:rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif=
;"><br></span></span></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><span><span style=3D"color:rgb(=
0, 0, 0);font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">So in t=
he general case for Spatial Droop q is 1/(n+1) rather than specifically 1/3=
.</span></span></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><span><span style=3D"color:rgb(0, 0, =
0);font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;"><br></span></=
span></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><span><div><div>As for the overall formula, you=
can see it as looking for the mid-points in the cells given n equal-sized =
cells (for n seats), but with different extreme points for the far left and=
far right cell.</div><div><br></div><div>So in the 2-candidate case:</div>=
<div><br></div><div>When q =3D 1/4, the extreme points are just 0 and 1</di=
v><div>When q =3D 1/3, the extreme points are 1/6 and 5/6</div><div>When q =
=3D 1/2, the extreme points are 1/2 and 1/2 (the cells have no size, forcin=
g everything into the middle)</div><div><br></div><div>In the general case:=
</div><div><br></div><div>The extreme points for wings would always be 0 an=
d 1</div><div dir=3D"ltr">The extreme points for Droop would be 1/(2(n+1)) =
and 1-<span><span style=3D"color:rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family:Helvetica Neue, H=
elvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">1/(2(n+1))</span></span></div><div>The extrem=
e points for majoritarian would always both be 1/2</div><div><br></div><div=
>q for the "wings" position is 1/(2n)</div><div>q for Droop is 1/(n+1)</div=
><div>q for majoritarian is 1/2</div><div><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">I thin=
k the formula for the extreme points would be 2q - 0.5 for a 0 to 1 scale.<=
/div></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">Some of this might m=
ake sense.</div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">Toby</div></spa=
n></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div><br></div>
=20
</div><div id=3D"ydp43ecad98yiv1013994983ydpc47340f5yahoo_quoted_22=
34304791" class=3D"ydp43ecad98yiv1013994983ydpc47340f5yahoo_quoted">
<div style=3D"font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, s=
ans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;">
=20
<div>
On Saturday, 13 June 2026 at 01:54:18 BST, Kristofe=
r Munsterhjelm via Election-Methods <[email protected]=
om> wrote:
</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
=20
=20
<div><div dir=3D"ltr">As mentioned in my previous post, I e=
xtended my PR measuring code to <br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">consider differe=
nt degrees of proportionality.<br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=
=3D"ltr">I haven't found a way to generalize proportionality degrees for an=
y <br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">number of seats (I should read that post, I su=
ppose...) but for two <br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">seats, I figured that it's=
not too hard. Since the voter opinion space <br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">dis=
tribution is a standard normal, it's symmetric around zero, so <br></div><d=
iv dir=3D"ltr">there's no reason for the method to prefer left-wing to righ=
t-wing <br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">candidates (or vice versa). Thus, the pro=
portionality level can be <br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">parameterized by just =
how far from the median the two elected candidates <br></div><div dir=3D"lt=
r">lie.<br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">That is, the e=
rror function is<br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"> sqrt((x_1 - y=
_1)^2 + (x_2 - y_2)^2)<br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"=
>and can be parameterized by a quantile level q, so that y_1 is the <br></d=
iv><div dir=3D"ltr">position corresponding to the qth quantile of the voter=
opinion space <br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">distribution, and y_2 is the (1-q=
)th quantile; and x_1 and x_2 is the <br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">location of=
the leftmost and rightmost elected candidate in opinion space.<br></div><d=
iv dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">The "significant" values of q, or=
at least those that come most readily <br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">to mind a=
s distinct, are, for two seats:<br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">  =
; q =3D 0<br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"> a=
s factional as possible, usually not a good idea, but perhaps useful <br></=
div><div dir=3D"ltr">for the unanimity setting I mentioned earlier.<br></di=
v><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"> q =3D 1/4<=
br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"> This is the=
"independent wings" position, where to elect a council, <br></div><div dir=
=3D"ltr">you split the voters into two halves (left-of-center and <br></div=
><div dir=3D"ltr">right-of-center) and elect the centrist from each (i.e. t=
he <br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">left-wingers' internal median and the right-w=
ingers' internal median). <br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">The median is at q =3D=
1/2, so a median of the left half is 1/4.<br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></=
div><div dir=3D"ltr"> q =3D 1/3<br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"=
> Spatial Droop proportionality.<br></=
div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"> q =3D 1/=
2<br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"> Bloc majo=
ritarian voting (elect as many median voter candidates as you <br></div><di=
v dir=3D"ltr">can).<br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">Th=
e VSE is then a goodness-of-fit value (and is the maximum VSE that <br></di=
v><div dir=3D"ltr">method can get at any q, grid search optimization inaccu=
racies <br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">notwithstanding). A low value means that =
even the best fit doesn't fit <br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">very well, and thu=
s that the method has trouble being consistently <br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"=
>proportional at any level. High values mean that the particular fit is a <=
br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">very good one.</div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><d=
iv dir=3D"ltr">-km<br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">----<br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"=
>Election-Methods mailing list - see <a href=3D"https://electorama.com/em" =
rel=3D"nofollow" target=3D"_blank">https://electorama.com/em</a> for list i=
nfo<br></div></div>
</div>
</div></div></div></div>
</div>
</div></body></html>
------=_Part_4047900_1359247322.1781370083813--
--===============6909060544768956814==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list info
--===============6909060544768956814==--