[MF:Apes] Genoa (via /contact form)

Kendall Clark <kendall-4GNy1lrxftmrG/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.politics.leftists.monkeyfist
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>>>>> "billh99" == billh99  <billh99-/[email protected]> writes:

  billh99> Violence begets more violence.  

Yep, in my experience, when the cops turn very violent and repressive
against protesting citizens, sometimes the citizens fight back. And
often the systematic violence that corporate globalization commits
every day against the poor of the world often begets violence in
response.

	   The "unarmed protester" who
  billh99> was killed by police was in the act of attacking police
  billh99> officers with a fire extinguisher (in most civilized
  billh99> societies this is call "assault with a deadly weapon").

Well, it depends, of course, on the circumstances. I don't know what
that police jeep was doing before the fire extinguisher came into
play; I do know that the cops were armed with semiautomatic weapons
and the protesters *weren't*.

At any rate, how do you defending shooting Carlo Guiliani *twice, in
the *head*, at very close range, and then running over his body in
that huge vehicle?!

I know that lots of reports are coming out of Genoa of police vehicles
trying to run over protesting citizens; for all we know this vehicle
had been doing just that.

  billh99> What a tragic waste of a human life, to die for such a
  billh99> stupid reason.  He wasn't a protestor, he was taking part
  billh99> in a violent riot, a common criminal who met an unfortunate
  billh99> but predictable end.  

That's nonsense. Cops aren't the only ones with the right to
self-defense, after all. You really have *no* idea what was happening
in Genoa, do you? Political protest isn't necessarily non-violent
after all.

	   Actions have consequences.  I would
  billh99> expect that any time 100,000 lunatics congregate for the
  billh99> sole purpose of violence, that someone will be hurt or
  billh99> killed.  

That was their *sole* purpose? That's just factually, objectively
false.

	   Fortunately this time it wasn't a police officer
  billh99> doing his job (by the way, they are human beings who have
  billh99> the same rights you claim for yourselves).  Actions have
  billh99> consequences.

At least you concede, as is perfectly clear, that the *job* of the
paramilitaries was to *repress*, beat, brutalize, harass, torture,
threaten, and contain the protesters. That was *clearly* their job and
they did it well. So, tell me, what are the G-8 so afraid of?

Cheers,
Kendall Clark
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.