Whose Equal Protection

>>>>> "dan" == Dan Esparza <danesparza-XzkMh+Atj/98UrSeD/[email protected]> writes:

   > http://monkeyfist.com/articles/725 It should come as no surprise
   > that the author of such a naked, odious celebration of white
   > privilege would not only act to install George W. Bush as
   > president but do so at the enormous risk of disenfranchising
   > American voters.

   > What planet are you on?  Have you actually read the Constitution
   > ... or are you one of those flunkies that waves their college
   > diploma around like a badge of honor, hoping that everyone will
   > think you're intelligent because you can put more than one word
   > in a sentence?  

You put several words in that sentence and I don't think you're
intelligent. Putting more than one word in a sentence doesn't seem to
be much of a challenge for most people. Maybe your experience has been
different?

Actually I'm both: I have read the Constitution *and* I'm the kind of
flunky that waves multiple college degrees around. :>

What is your point?

   > If you can identify the sentence(s) within the
   > Constitution of United States of America that support your
   > position, I'll gladly send you a check for $50, and endorse your
   > column from the highest mountain.  

Well, which *part* of my position? And isn't this a category mistake?
Why on earth would I look to the Constitution to support my view, to
name only a few of the claims I make, that:

     - Wm. Rehnquist is a racist who's defended white privilege his
     entire life;
     
     - it shouldn't surprise anyone that someone of Rehnquist's low
     moral character would so favor Bush at the expense of African
     American or women voters (and others) in Florida.

If you'd like to identify which position of mine is of the type such
that it can be properly validated by appeal to the Constitution, I'll
gladly show you which part of the Constituion validates it.

Then you can send me that $50. :>

   > The truth is you have neither
   > the intelligence nor the intestinal fortitude to READ the
   > Constitution, much less mount an argument based on it.  You
   > disgust me, and Republicans of all colors will bury you.

Since I have read the Constitution, I guess you're out of luck. Sorry.

I would "mount an argument based on it" if that were my intent, but,
again, it wasn't. So sorry.

You are an ill-mannered, uncouth person. What kind of decent human
being attacks a perfect stranger in this way? I suspect, further, that
disgusting the likes of you is the best thing I've done in some
time. Hooray for me!

As for being buried by Republicans, what will I care if I'm dead? It
would be a frightful disappointment for my friends and family, and I
hope they'll have the strength to throw the beasties right out! 

Best,
Kendall Clark
-- 
Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.