Re: Nader's Big Chance

On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Bijan Parsia wrote:

> >  We didn't agree with
> > each other last time either ;)  However, I figured it was worth restating
> > since presumably this mailing list has a larger audience than the IRC chat
> > room.
>
> Well, so much for trying to convince *me* then. Wow, I'm boggled by how
> sleazy that is, espeically given your little "preretracted" insinuations

I'm sleazy for trying to include other people in a discussion I think
is worth having?

I didn't think this mailing list was a forum for convincing wacko
republicans (which seems highly optimistic), I thought it was a forum for
discussion.  Maybe not?


-dave

/*==================
www.urth.org
We await the New Sun
==================*/