Re: eek!
Bijan Parsia <bparsia-vEoVa6Jh+/J4piUD7e9S/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.leftists.monkeyfist |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, benjamin a graffam wrote: > maybe its me, but i completely missed the point of this excerpt. The exerpt or the exchange? > what > is so revolting about liking early nights with your wife?...so the guy > likes his wife, big deal. Hmm. That's certainly not the point. > so what if he changed his mind later that > night with another apeal from a staff member. Nor that, though that's not quite the right description of what the report claims happened. > am i missing > something? Seems so. >....maybe i need something explained to me. peace. ben. Maybe, but I'm unsure what. You have to start from the obsession with Clinton's sex and/or marital life (even before Monica, and even aside from his extra-maritals) and the varioius sexualizations of Hillary Rodham Clinton. *Then* look at the report. Try to apply similar or analogous transformations. Or inverted ones. Or don't. :) But that would be the starting place. Cheers, Bijan Parsia.