Re: eek!

Bijan Parsia <bparsia-vEoVa6Jh+/J4piUD7e9S/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.politics.leftists.monkeyfist
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, benjamin a graffam wrote:

> 	maybe its me, but i completely missed the point of this excerpt.

The exerpt or the exchange?

>  what
> is so revolting about liking early nights with your wife?...so the guy
> likes his wife, big deal.

Hmm. That's certainly not the point.

>  so what if he changed his mind later that
> night with another apeal from a staff member.

Nor that, though that's not quite the right description of what the report
claims happened.

>  am i missing
> something?

Seems so.

>....maybe i need something explained to me.    peace. ben.

Maybe, but I'm unsure what. You have to start from the obsession with
Clinton's sex and/or marital life (even before Monica, and even aside from
his extra-maritals) and the varioius sexualizations of Hillary Rodham
Clinton.

*Then* look at the report. Try to apply similar or analogous
transformations. Or inverted ones.

Or don't. :) But that would be the starting place.

Cheers,
Bijan Parsia.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.