Re: RE: Naders Big Chance

>>>>> "dave" == Dave Rolsky <[email protected]> writes:

  dave> On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Greg Konig wrote:
  >> I don't understand what you mean by "the most damaging...  the
  >> more important criterion."  Help me here...

  dave> I am concerned at the type of world we
  dave> would end up with if we removed the first entirely without
  dave> ever addressing the second.

  dave> Anyway, I don't propose that I have an answer to these
  dave> questions, but I am concerned when bigotry unaccompanied by
  dave> oppression is allowed to pass without comment.

Dave,

I'm curious about this. Can you say anything at all about what kind of
world this might be, or what there might be about it that so concerns
you?

<speculation type="wild ass">It seems to me that in such a world, that
is, in one where there is no systematic oppression of racial groups,
there *could* be relatively harmless individual bigotry and prejudice
that wouldn't amount to very much. The world then might actually be
like what most Whites falsely take it to be like today.</speculation>

Kendall
-- 
Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.