Re: Re: age is relevant
Bijan Parsia <bparsia-vEoVa6Jh+/J4piUD7e9S/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.leftists.monkeyfist |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Originally I was going to cc this to the person with the PhD in
bragging, but I actually think there's an interesting issue. Why waste it
on that wanker? Kendall, if you want to forward it though, feel free.
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 04:02:57PM -0800, court court muttered
> something about:
[snip]
> How about this: what if the president had said "hebs"? Could we assume some
> Jewish Americans were offended? I think so. Though you'd probably defend him
> for saying that, too.
It's interesting and instructive to compare this to the famous Jesse
Jackson "Hymietown" incident. The cases are slightly different...clearly
Jackson knew it was a slur (though he may not have thought of it as a
particularly bad one). I don't have concrete evidence to hand that he
apologized, but I believe he did. It's going to dog him for the rest of
his life. Last year, I had an exchange with a moron who accused me of
being an antisemite because I *mentioned* Jesse Jackson.
An instructive countercase is Robert Bryd, 4th in line to the presidency,
etc. etc. used the N-word recently ("condemning" it in some weird way) and
holds the second place record (I beleive) for filibustering a civil rights
bill. Forgive and forget!
But at least he apologized for his most recent blunder.
Bush doesn't even have to apology.
> > The basic assertion of your article is that you,
> > Kendall, are alone able to discern an ethnic slur.
>
> Nonsense. It's *clearly* a racist slur. That has nothing to do with me.
[snip]
The *nonsense* part is that you did it alone! :) Whitey ignores the
vaguely brown person *again* :)
(Well, "court court" might not be white.)
People need to read up on the difference between speaker's meaning and
sentence meaning. Plus, the bad bit is the failure to apologize.
Where are all the leftist condemning us for not bashing Bush for his more
material crimes? (Although, if it helps push a revolution in Pakistan,
it'll be bad enough.)
(Not that I'm a friend to the current Pakistani gov't, but the forces in
any likely revolution don't looks so great. Plus, we'd just annex it with
extreme prejudice. Not good.)
Cheers,
Bijan Parsia.