RE: Tell Dr. Laura what you think of her hate-mongering

I *was* going to reply to Bijan with a simple "touche" since I saw the
little emoticon smile.  However, if it was actually intended to be
"condescending sarcasm", then my reply should be perhaps a bit less
civil.  
-Jack

-----Original Message-----
From: bparsia [mailto:bparsia-vEoVa6Jh+/J4piUD7e9S/[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 1:25 PM
To: bonobos
Cc: bparsia
Subject: RE: [Bonobos] Tell Dr. Laura what you think of her
hate-mongering


On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, damien wrote:

> > > How do you know that Mr. Foster is white?
> >
> > How do you know Clydefoster1 is a Mr.? :)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Bijan.
> 
> Why is it that Clyde Foster's email associating homosexuals with
> pedophiles flies by uncritiqued, Bijan,

Because I haven't had time to put together a response yet?

> but you single out my reply for
> pointless, condescending sarcasm?

Actually, my attributions got screwed. It's *Jack's* response that I
meant
to single out for pointed, if condescending, sarcasm. I screwed it up,
and
I'm sorry.


>  It's a truism on the internet that
> identity cannot be proved, and pointing it out here is not only
obvious,
> but non-responsive to the thread.  I would have expected a bit more
from
> you.

That was the point I was trying to raise against Jack.

> Why is homosexual behavior open to unanswered critique here,

Come come! I think you know that, in general, it's not.

> but
> stereotypically straight white male behavior (regardless of who may be
> mimicking it at the moment) is not?

You know that it is.

> For the record, heterosexual males are more statistically likely to be
> pedophiles than homosexual males.

Absolutely.

>  They also account for the vast
> majority of rapes, murders, drug abuse and incest convictions.

Of course.

Cheers,
Bijan.

_______________________________________________
Bonobos maillist  -  Bonobos-4GNy1lrxftmrG/[email protected]
http://monkeyfist.com/mailman/listinfo/bonobos