Re: Why Bush Should Be Impeached, #84

> I don't want to know about, much less agree with anything called "Bijan's
> thrust"... Egads!

actually, I think that will be the name of my new band: "Ladies and
Gentlemen, please welcome Bijan's Thrust!"
 

> Really? Gross violations of the law governing the use of international force
> isn't a high crime?

yes, but this is not what Clinton was impeached for.  That's my point about
abuse of the system.

> I'm pretty sure that's what I said yesterday. I guess it's worth more coming
> from a lawyer? :>

Hey, don't let that get out!  ;-)  anyway, not until November, at least,
when my bar exam results will prove the truth or falsity of it!

mbz