FW: Farley - Did the Green Party Betray Black America?
Kendall Grant Clark <kendall-4GNy1lrxftmrG/[email protected]> Thu, 1 Aug 2002 12:03:07 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.leftists.monkeyfist |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "sharon" == Sharon Stade <[email protected]> writes: sharon> " ... I didnt think much of the Greens. They seemed to be just sharon> another group of alienated white hippies primarily concerned with sharon> the environment, but ignorant (perhaps willfully so) of the issues sharon> that affected black people specifically... That was before the sharon> party in Nashville... ...I was the only African-American in the sharon> house, and I figured that, since everyone there was a liberal, I sharon> wouldnt hear anything shocking. I was dead wrong. This is what I sharon> heardand when I did hear it, I had to sit up and take notice: The sharon> Green Party, someone said, in another conversation, is the first sharon> party since the Black Panthers to support reparations for slavery. sharon> I was floored. I know a bit about this. I was at the platform committee meeting in Denver in the summer of 2000, as the platform representative from Texas, when this was voted on. To say the Green Party "supports reparations" is a bit misleading. First, as I think I've written somewhere before, there were more people on the committee who *had no idea what reparations are* than who voted for them to pass. As I recall, the vote was 3 yays, 1 nay, and 12 abstensions, or something like that. I remember explaining to a very important national GP leader -- an older white woman from Missouri -- that, no, reparations did not mean, as she had asked, "giving checks to black people without jobs", though I'm still unsure what would be wrong with *that*. So, yes, it's in the platform, but the GP platform is a complete disaster; *everything* is in the platform. It's there because it was the hobby horse of one member of the platform committee, and no one else cared enough about it either way to kill it. I wouldn't call that a sign of deep support. As for rank and file support for reparations, judging by the Greens I've encountered, it's also pretty thin, at least in the Southwest. More to the point, I encountered heavy resistance from Greens every time I proposed an antiracist agenda or specific antiracist policy ideas. I was asked to leave -- and eventually left -- the Greens in Texas for refusing to stop asking the Dallas Greens to confront one of its leaders who used the n-word and was openly racist. But probably I'm just bitter. Or something. Kendall Clark