The Biology of Skin Color: Black and White

----
The Biology of Skin Color:  Black and White
URL:http://monkeyfist.com:8080/morgue/politics/antiracism/theory-skin-color
Subject: 
----

DISCOVER Vol. 22 No. 2 (February 2001)

The Biology of Skin Color:  Black and White 
By Gina Kirchweger

Ten years ago, while at the university of Western Australia,
anthropologist Nina Jablonski was asked to give a lecture on human
skin. As an expert in primate evolution, she decided to discuss the
evolution of skin color, but when she went through the literature on
the subject she was dismayed. Some theories advanced before the 1970s
tended to be racist, and others were less than convincing. White skin,
for example, was reported to be more resistant to cold weather, although
groups like the Inuit are both dark and particularly resistant to
cold. After the 1970s, when researchers were presumably more aware of
the controversy such studies could kick up, there was very little work
at all. "It's one of these things everybody notices," Jablonski says,
"but nobody wants to talk about."

No longer. Jablonski and her husband, George Chaplin, a geographic
information systems specialist, have formulated the first comprehensive
theory of skin color. Their findings, published in a recent issue of
the Journal of Human Evolution, show a strong, somewhat predictable
correlation between skin color and the strength of sunlight across
the globe. But they also show a deeper, more surprising process at
work: Skin color, they say, is largely a matter of vitamins.

Jablonski, now chairman of the anthropology department at the
California Academy of Sciences, begins by assuming that our earliest
ancestors had fair skin just like chimpanzees, our closest biological
relatives. Between 4.5 million and 2 million years ago, early humans
moved from the rain forest and onto the East African savanna. Once on
the savanna, they not only had to cope with more exposure to the sun,
but they also had to work harder to gather food. Mammalian brains are
particularly vulnerable to overheating: A change of only five or six
degrees can cause a heatstroke. So our ancestors had to develop a better
cooling system.

The answer was sweat, which dissipates heat through evaporation. Early
humans probably had few sweat glands, like chimpanzees, and those were
mainly located on the palms of their hands and the bottoms of their
feet. Occasionally, however, individuals were born with more glands than
usual. The more they could sweat, the longer they could forage before
the heat forced them back into the shade. The more they could forage,
the better their chances of having healthy offspring and of passing on
their sweat glands to future generations.

A million years of natural selection later, each human has about 2
million sweat glands spread across his or her body. Human skin, being
less hairy than chimpanzee skin, "dries much quicker," says Adrienne
Zihlman, an anthropologist at the University of California at Santa
Cruz. "Just think how after a bath it takes much longer for wet hair to
dry."

Hairless skin, however, is particularly vulnerable to damage from
sunlight. Scientists long assumed that humans evolved melanin, the main
determinant of skin color, to absorb or disperse ultraviolet light. But
what is it about ultraviolet light that melanin protects against? Some
researchers pointed to the threat of skin cancer. But cancer usually
develops late in life, after a person has already reproduced. Others
suggested that sunburned nipples would have hampered breast-feeding. But
a slight tan is enough to protect mothers against that problem.

During her preparation for the lecture in Australia, Jablonski found a
1978 study that examined the effects of ultraviolet light on folate,
a member of the vitamin B complex. An hour of intense sunlight, the
study showed, is enough to cut folate levels in half if your skin is
light. Jablonski made the next, crucial connection only a few weeks
later. At a seminar on embryonic development, she heard that low folate
levels are correlated with neural-tube defects such as spina bifida and
anencephaly, in which infants are born without a full brain or spinal
cord.

Jablonski later came across three documented cases in which children's
neural-tube defects were linked to their mothers' visits to tanning
studios during early pregnancy. Moreover, she found that folate is
crucial to sperm development-- so much so that a folate inhibitor was
developed as a male contraceptive. ("It never got anywhere," Jablonski
says. "It was so effective that it knocked out all folate in the
body.") She now had some intriguing evidence that folate might be the
driving force behind the evolution of darker skin. But why do some
people have light skin?

As far back as the 1960s, the biochemist W. Farnsworth Loomis had
suggested that skin color is determined by the body's need for vitamin
D. The vitamin helps the body absorb calcium and deposit it in bones,
an essential function, particularly in fast-growing embryos. (The need
for vitamin D during pregnancy may explain why women around the globe
tend to have lighter skin than men.) Unlike folate, vitamin D depends
on ultraviolet light for its production in the body. Loomis believed
that people who live in the north, where daylight is weakest, evolved
fair skin to help absorb more ultraviolet light and that people in the
tropics evolved dark skin to block the light, keeping the body from
overdosing on vitamin D, which can be toxic at high concentrations.

By the time Jablonski did her research, Loomis's hypothesis had been
partially disproved. "You can never overdose on natural amounts of
vitamin D," Jablonski says. "There are only rare cases where people
take too many cod-liver supplements." But Loomis's insight about fair
skin held up, and it made a perfect complement for Jablonski's insight
about folate and dark skin. The next step was to find some hard data
correlating skin color to light levels.

Until the 1980s, researchers could only estimate how much ultraviolet
radiation reaches Earth's surface. But in 1978, NASA launched the
Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer. Three years ago, Jablonski and
Chaplin took the spectrometer's global ultraviolet measurements
and compared them with published data on skin color in indigenous
populations from more than 50 countries. To their delight, there was an
unmistakable correlation: The weaker the ultraviolet light, the fairer
the skin. Jablonski went on to show that people living above 50 degrees
latitude have the highest risk of vitamin D deficiency. "This was one
of the last barriers in the history of human settlement," Jablonski
says. "Only after humans learned fishing, and therefore had access to
food rich in vitamin D, could they settle these regions."

Humans have spent most of their history moving around. To do that,
they've had to adapt their tools, clothes, housing, and eating habits
to each new climate and landscape. But Jablonski's work indicates
that our adaptations go much further. People in the tropics have
developed dark skin to block out the sun and protect their body's folate
reserves. People far from the equator have developed fair skin to drink
in the sun and produce adequate amounts of vitamin D during the long
winter months.

Jablonski hopes that her research will alert people to the importance
of vitamin D and folate in their diet. It's already known, for example,
that dark-skinned people who move to cloudy climes can develop
conditions such as rickets from vitamin D deficiencies. More important,
Jablonski hopes her work will begin to change the way people think about
skin color. "We can take a topic that has caused so much disagreement,
so much suffering, and so much misunderstanding," she says, "and
completely disarm it."