Major anti-war coalitions in U.S. call for unified demonstration
Macdonald Stainsby <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:37:03 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.communism.environmental,gmane.politics.leninism.international |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
End the occupation -- Bring the troops home now Major anti-war coalitions in U.S. call for unified demonstration By Brian Becker On March 20, the first anniversary of the launch of the blitzkrieg war against Iraq, hundreds of thousands of people will be in the streets in New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles and San Francisco for massive regional demonstrations. People will also protest in hundreds of other cities in the United States and around the world. One year ago, at the start of the war, people were in the streets worldwide demanding, "No war against Iraq." It was a simple and a straightforward slogan reflecting the immediate and compelling need of the moment. Organizations and coalitions that had sharply different political programs united or marched together under that banner. The slogans for the upcoming March 20 demonstration must and will reflect a far different situation. Obviously, the goal of the demonstration is not to prevent an imminent war. The war happened. Tens of thousands of Iraqis died as the U.S. military machine swept through Iraq, reaching Baghdad in three weeks. The Iraqi government was dispersed under assault by overwhelming force, and has been replaced by a U.S. military dictatorship. The Iraqi people are now living under foreign occupation--and are resisting. After weeks of intense political debate, the major U.S. anti-war coalitions have decided to work together for a single, massive, united demonstration in New York City on March 20. The focus of the debate was the specific slogans and political program. On Feb. 6, the coalitions that are uniting to build a single demonstration issued a joint statement. The statement reads in part: "We will march for an end to the occupation and corporate control of Iraq and to bring the troops home now. We will march for an end to the occupation of Palestine. We will march to fund human needs, restore cuts in social programs and against the ever-expanding attacks on all immigrants, labor rights and everyone's civil liberties--and we will stand united against racism here and abroad." The anti-war movement's decision to link its call for an immediate end to the occupation of Iraq with support for the Palestinian people is a sign of a new level of political growth and development. Throughout the world, the struggle of the Palestinian people is considered a national liberation movement fighting against colonial occupation, racism and apartheid. In the U.S. anti-war movement, however, the Palestinian struggle has been ignored or even vilified for decades. The adoption of the agreed- upon political program for a unified March 20 demonstration-- including the centrality of Palestine--constitutes a vital step forward for the U.S. anti-war movement. This political battle is far from over. Some leadership sectors of the anti-war movement are following a particular strategic conception that makes true and consistent solidarity with the Palestinian struggle almost impossible. They portray the current U.S. war drive as a particular policy of a right-wing political grouping represented by the Bush White House. They assert that the only way to really stop the war drive is to unseat Bush. They are rallying the anti-war movement to support what they consider to be less warlike politicians- -be it Howard Dean, John Kerry or even Gen. Wesley Clark. But no capitalist politician can aspire to the presidency and also take a strong stand against Israel as it continues the colonial project in historic Palestine. All sectors in the U.S. corporate and political establishment, and its media, maintain unswerving commitment to the U.S.- Israeli alliance. Not because they are opponents of anti-Semitism, but because Israel serves as a proxy, a garrison state defending U.S. interests in this strategic and oil- rich region. Those in the anti-war movement who are oriented toward a strategic alliance with a purported liberal sector of the capitalist establishment have compelled that part of the movement to ignore the just struggle of the Palestinian people. Not just Bush's war The significant advance in the adoption of the March 20 political program was the consequence of several factors. The most important was a historic political initiative undertaken by progressive organizations from the Arab-American and Muslim com munity. This took the form of an "Open Letter to the U.S. Anti-War Move ment" signed by 41 organizations that stated, "We do not accept delinking the struggle of the Palestinian people from the anti-war movement, and regard the struggle in Palestine, as it is viewed worldwide, to be central to any peace and justice mobilization." The initiators of the letter asked for other organizations outside the Arab and Muslim community to sign on in solidarity. This open letter sparked a sharp debate within some national anti-war organizations, inside progressive labor and legal organizations, and in cities and towns around the country. Within three weeks more than 275 organizations--frequently after considerable discussion--had signed the open letter. Support generated by the open letter also contributed to the power of the call from the March 20 National Coalition to have a unified demonstration based on a political program that included in its central demands "End colonial occupation from Iraq to Palestine, and everywhere-- bring the troops home now!" The March 20 National Coalition includes the ANSWER Coalition--Act Now to Stop War & End Racism; Al-Awda, the Palestine Right to Return Coalition; National Lawyers Guild; Arab Muslim American Federation; Free Palestine Alliance-U.S.A; Muslim American Society Freedom Foundation; and the Muslim Student Association of the U.S. and Canada. The National Council of Arab Americans also supports the call of the March 20 National Coalition. The political orientation of this coalition was outlined in its Jan. 2 statement: "We will demonstrate on March 20 to support the right of the Iraqi people to self-determination without condition. Since the invasion began, tens of thousands of Iraqi people have been killed. Thousands of U.S. and British soldiers have been killed or wounded. The Iraqi people are resisting the occupation--they want the foreign soldiers occupying their country to leave, not tomorrow but today. Growing numbers of U.S. soldiers and their families are calling for the troops to be brought home NOW. These soldiers are being sent to kill and be killed for a war that was based on lies and fraud perpetrated by the Bush government. There is only one solution: to end the occupation now! We believe, in the words of the National Council of Arab Americans, that 'internationalizing the occupation gives colonialism a new marketable cover and should not be accepted as a viable option for the global popular movement.'" In addition to Palestine, the other ongoing controversy in the anti- war movement has to do with slogans regarding the occupation of Iraq. Some anti-war groups favor a transitional occupation strategy leading to a United Nations takeover of the U.S. occupation authority. The ANSWER Coalition and others in the March 20 National Coalition rejected this position as an inherent violation of the Iraqi people's right to self- determination. Sup porting any form of foreign occupation authority legitimizes the argument that the U.S. had the right to carry out the overthrow of the government in Iraq. The March 20 demonstrations, in order to be relevant, must focus on opposing colonial-style occupation. The Iraqi people must be totally free to determine their own destiny. U.S. and all foreign military forces must immediately exit Iraq. The authorities who ordered the blitzkrieg invasion should be tried for war crimes and crimes against humanity. The Iraq invasion was a war for empire, a war aimed at enslaving the Arab and other peoples of the Middle East and South Asia. The goal was to secure control over all the vast oil and gas natural gas of the entire region for decades to come. From Iraq to Palestine to Libya to Iran to Afghanistan and the Caspian region of the former Soviet Union-- the goal of the Wall Street capitalists and the Pentagon is to possess or control the energy supplies that are the central artery of the world economy. The warmakers' assorted public-relations slogans to justify their aggression--"to keep the world safe from weapons of mass destruction," or to "fight terrorism," or to "liberate the Iraqi people from Saddam Hussein's dictatorship"--were rubbish from beginning. The ANSWER Coalition, which has organized most of the large anti-war demon strations since Sept. 11, believes that the wars and occupation in Afghan istan and Iraq are not simply the consequence of the "mistaken policies" of a "bad president." The war and occupation of Afghanistan are supported by almost every politician from both the Democratic and Republican parties. While differing with Bush on the tactic of unilateral U.S. invasion of Iraq, the same politicians embraced the idea of crushing the Iraqi regime and replacing it with a U.S.-puppet government. None favors ending the occupation. The goal of destroying Iraqi sovereignty, euphemistically labeled "regime change," became the official U.S. government policy in October 1998 under President Bill Clinton. It was then that the weapons inspectors were pulled out of Iraq so that the U.S. Air Force could begin the massive bombing of Iraq. The Dec ember 1998 vote in Congress to authorize almost $100 million to begin the ouster of the Iraqi government was nearly unanimous. It had the support of Dennis Kucinich, John Kerry and the other Democratic opponents of Bush today. The anti-war movement, to be a voice for progressive change, must expose all mechanisms used by imperialism to impose its political will on the people of the Middle East, or in Latin America, Africa or Asia. That requires maintaining a political orientation to these goals independent from and not in obedience to any section of the capitalist political establishment. The March 20 demonstration will be an important step forward in this direction. n - END - (Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but changing it is not allowed. For more information contact Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail: [email protected]. Subscribe wwnews- [email protected]. Unsubscribe [email protected]. Support the voice of resistance http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php) -- Macdonald Stainsby http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/rad-green In the contradiction lies the hope --Brecht. _______________________________________________ Rad-Green mailing list [email protected] To change your options or unsubscribe go to: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/rad-green