A year of silence since Rachel Corrie died

A year of silence since Rachel Corrie died
Elizabeth Corrie
International Herald Tribune
Thursday, March 4, 2004

http://www.iht.com/articles/508588.html

ATLANTA, Georgia Only a year ago, the month of March would have held the 
same positive associations for me as it has for many - the beginning of 
the end of winter, the promise of springtime and even summer. This year, 
and for every year for the rest of my life, the approach of March will 
mean something else entirely - the anniversary of the brutal death of my 
cousin, Rachel Corrie.

On March 16, 2003, an Israeli soldier and his commander ran over Rachel 
with a nine-ton Caterpillar bulldozer while she stood - unarmed, clearly 
visible in her orange fluorescent jacket - protecting a Palestinian home 
slated for demolition by the Israeli army. The death of Rachel Corrie, 
and the response that her case has - and has not - received, reveal 
several disturbing, indeed immoral and criminal, truths.

First, Rachel died while attempting to prevent the demolition of a home, 
a common practice of the Israeli Army's collective punishment that has 
left more than 12,000 Palestinians homeless since the beginning of the 
second uprising in September 2000. This practice violates international 
law, including the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Second, Rachel was run over by a Caterpillar bulldozer, manufactured in 
the United States and sent to Israel as part of the regular U.S. aid 
package to Israel, which amounts to $3 billion to $4 billion annually, 
all of it from U.S. taxpayers. The use of Caterpillar bulldozers to 
destroy civilian homes, not to mention to run over unarmed human rights 
activists, violates U.S. law, including the U.S. Arms Export Control 
Act, which prohibits the use of military aid against civilians.

Third, the self-acquittal of the Israeli army for Rachel's death and the 
resistance of the state of Israel to an independent investigation into 
this case reveals both the Sharon administration's unwillingness to take 
responsibility for the death of a U.S. citizen and the Bush 
administration's cowardice in allowing another nation to attack U.S. 
citizens with impunity.

Fourth, Rachel's death was in fact only the first of several Israeli 
attacks on foreign citizens in the West Bank and Gaza. Brian Avery, from 
New Mexico, was shot in the face on April 5; Tom Hurndall, a British 
citizen, was shot in the head on April 11 and died Jan. 13, and James 
Miller, another British citizen, was also shot and killed in April. To 
date, only in Hurndall's case will the Israeli soldier responsible for 
the attack face trial, and this is because the British government, after 
several months, finally responded to the overwhelming evidence presented 
by the Hurndall family.

As we approach March 16, residents and citizens of the United States 
should ask themselves how it is that an unarmed U.S. citizen can be 
killed with impunity by a soldier from an allied nation receiving 
massive U.S. aid, using a product manufactured in the United States by a 
U.S. corporation and paid for with U.S. tax dollars. When three 
Americans were killed, presumably by Palestinians, in an explosion on 
Oct. 15, 2003, as they traveled through Gaza, the FBI came within 24 
hours to investigate the deaths. After one year, neither the FBI nor any 
other U.S.-led team has done anything to investigate the death of an 
American killed by an Israeli.

Why the double standard? Perhaps this reveals the most disturbing truth 
of all.

Elizabeth Corrie is an administrator and teacher in a school in Atlanta.

-- 
Macdonald Stainsby
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/rad-green
In the contradiction lies the hope
		--Brecht.



_______________________________________________
Rad-Green mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/rad-green