| Newsgroups |
gmane.politics.marxism.analysis |
| Message-ID |
<W669563986231441413967105@atl4webmail04> |
----=_vm_0011_W669563986_23144_1413967105
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----Original Message-----
From: David McReynolds [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 10:00 PM
To: 'Landy & Harrison-Campaign for Peace & Democracy', 'Socialist Party Members',
'Committees of Correspondence', [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: ISIS, Kobane, and the Future of the Middle East
I appreciate this statement and am circulating it, but there are some problems of political reality
that it doesn't address. I'm sending this to my Edgeleft list and to the Middle East list.
First, one of the ironies of the Kobani situation is that the Kurds are sharply divided - the Kurds
in Iraq had no interest in the defense of Kobani. Turkey certainly didn't, sitting right across the border with
its tanks and guns pointed at Kobani but remaining silent. The Turkish position has been that the
US and its allies must destroy the Assad regime as well as ISIS.
The US is in a tricky position, having decided to arm and train the "moderate opposition" to
Assad in the hopes they will deal with ISIS. But the battles between the armed rebels
and the Syrian government forces are bitter, nasty, and intense. There is really no such
thing as a "moderate" military force. The Syrian rebels, who are deeply divided amongst
themselves, are very unlikely to make ISIS their primary target. They are almost certain to
continue to make the government of Syria their primary target.
And the reality of the Kurds in Kobani is that they are led by forces on the US terrorist
list, and have had good relations with the Syrian government. Their primary enemy is ISIS,
not Assad.
One of my contacts in Israel noted in a post to me that pacifists have to realize that the
air strikes by the US, which we oppose, have helped turn the tide. I don't have an easy
way out of this dilemma - it is a fact that if ISIS is defeated in Kobani, it will be a tribute
not only to the courage and tenacity of the Kurds there, but also to US military action.
And we are in a situation where I think that bad as the Assad government is, ISIS
is the greater problem. If there is to be a solution to the tragedy of Syria it will certainly
involve the isolation of ISIS, both in Syria and in Iraq. But it will also involve some kind
of negotiations with the Syrian government, which has the support of both Russia and Iran,
while the opponents of the Syrian government include not only the moderate rebels in
Syria, but also Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey - hardly a democratic coalition, but
that is the coalition the US has put together.
The world needs peace in Syria - the Syrians are desperate for it. Russia can play
a role, as it did in helping Syria get ride of chemical weapons. The US needs to
involve both Iran and Russia in negotiations, at least as much as we need to work with
Saudi Arabia.
It is in this sense that I find the statement by the Campaign for Peace and Democracy
missing some points. It has, with good reason, opposed the Syrian government, but
I think does not see that peace in Syria will need to involve that government as well as
the rebels.
It is a complex situation - I have no easy answers and perhaps no answers at all.
But I do think there are questions that need to be asked.
David McReynolds
----=_vm_0011_W669563986_23144_1413967105
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<head>
<style type="text/css">
<!--
/* start of attachment style */
.ygrp-photo-title{
clear: both;
font-size: smaller;
height: 15px;
overflow: hidden;
text-align: center;
width: 75px;
}
div.ygrp-photo{
background-position: center;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-color: white;
border: 1px solid black;
height: 62px;
width: 62px;
}
div.photo-title
a,
div.photo-title a:active,
div.photo-title a:hover,
div.photo-title a:visited {
text-decoration: none;
}
div.attach-table div.attach-row {
clear: both;
}
div.attach-table div.attach-row div {
float: left;
/* margin: 2px;*/
}
p {
clear: both;
padding: 15px 0 3px 0;
overflow: hidden;
}
div.ygrp-file {
width: 30px;
valign: middle;
}
div.attach-table div.attach-row div div a {
text-decoration: none;
}
div.attach-table div.attach-row div div span {
font-weight: normal;
}
div.ygrp-file-title {
font-weight: bold;
}
/* end of attachment style */
-->
</style>
</head>
<html>
<div><font face="Verdana" size="2"> </font></div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div>
-----Original Message-----<br><b>From:</b> David McReynolds [mailto:[email protected]]<br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, October 21, 2014 10:00 PM<br><b>To:</b> 'Landy & Harrison-Campaign for Peace & Democracy', 'Socialist Party Members', <br>'Committees of Correspondence', [email protected], <br>[email protected]<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: ISIS, Kobane, and the Future of the Middle East<br><br><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div>I appreciate this statement and am circulating it, but there are some problems of political reality<br>that it doesn't address. I'm sending this to my <span tabindex="-1" id=":1xz.1">Edgeleft</span> list and to the Middle East list.<br><br></
div>First, one of the ironies of the <span tabindex="-1" id=":1xz.2">Kobani</span> situation is that the Kurds are sharply divided - the Kurds<br></div>in Iraq had no interest in the defense of <span tabindex="-1" id=":1xz.3">Kobani</span>. Turkey certainly didn't, sitting right across the border with <br></div>its tanks and guns pointed at <span tabindex="-1" id=":1xz.4">Kobani</span> but remaining silent. The Turkish position has been that the<br></div>US and its allies must destroy the Assad regime as well as ISIS.<br><br></div>The US is in a tricky position, having decided to arm and train the "moderate opposition" to<br></div>Assad in the hopes they will deal with ISIS. But the battles between the armed rebels<br></div>and the Syrian government forces are bitter, nasty, and intense.
There is really no such <br>thing as a "moderate" military force. The Syrian rebels, who are deeply divided amongst <br>themselves, are very unlikely to make ISIS their primary target. They are almost certain to<br>continue to make the government of Syria their primary target.<br><br></div>And the reality of the Kurds in <span tabindex="-1" id=":1xz.5">Kobani</span> is that they are led by forces on the US terrorist<br>list, and have had good relations with the Syrian government. Their primary enemy is ISIS,<br>not Assad.<br><br></div>One of my contacts in Israel noted in a post to me that pacifists have to realize that the<br></div>air strikes by the US, which we oppose, have helped turn the tide. I don't have an easy<br></div>way out of this dilemma - it is a fact that if ISIS i
s defeated in <span tabindex="-1" id=":1xz.6">Kobani</span>, it will be a tribute<br>not only to the courage and tenacity of the Kurds there, but also to US military action.<br><br></div>And we are in a situation where I think that bad as the Assad government is, ISIS<br></div>is the greater problem. If there is to be a solution to the tragedy of Syria it will certainly<br>involve the isolation of ISIS, both in Syria and in Iraq. But it will also involve some kind<br></div>of negotiations with the Syrian government, which has the support of both Russia and Iran,<br>while the opponents of the Syrian government include not only the moderate rebels in<br>Syria, but also Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey - hardly a democratic coalition, but<br>that is the coalition the US has put togeth
er.<br><br></div>The world needs peace in Syria - the Syrians are desperate for it. Russia can play<br></div>a role, as it did in helping Syria get ride of chemical weapons. The US needs to <br></div>involve both Iran and Russia in negotiations, at least as much as we need to work with <br></div>Saudi Arabia.<br><br></div>It is in this sense that I find the statement by the Campaign for Peace and Democracy<br></div>missing some points. It has, with good reason, opposed the Syrian government, but<br></div>I think does not see that peace in Syria will need to involve that government as well as<br>the rebels.<br><br></div>It is a complex situation - I have no easy answers and perhaps no answers at all.<br>But I do think there are questions that need to be asked.<br><br></div>David McReynold
s<br></div>
<!-- |**|begin egp html banner|**| -->
<br>
<br>
<!-- |**|end egp html banner|**| -->
<div width="1" style="color: white; clear: both;"/>__._,_.___</div>
<div id="fromDMARC" style="clear:both; margin-top: 10px;">
<hr style="height:2px ; border-width:0; color:#E3E3E3; background-color:#E3E3E3;">
Posted by: "Hunter Gray" <[email protected]> <hr style="height:2px ; border-width:0; color:#E3E3E3; background-color:#E3E3E3;">
</div>
<!-- Start Recommendations -->
<!-- End Recommendations -->
<!-- |**|begin egp html banner|**| -->
<br><br>
<tt>
"[C]apital comes dripping from head to foot, from every pore, with blood and dirt."<BR>
--Marx, Capital, Vol. 1, Chapter 31<BR>
<BR>