subimperial practices Re: Overseas investment by China's private and public corporations
"Patrick Bond" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.marxism.marxmail |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026/08/26 22:00, Marv Gandall via groups.io wrote: > ... > This has led to Marxists identifying a profusion of "imperialist" and > "sub-imperialist" countries, diluting the concept which once referred > only to those countries which had formal "empires". No Marv, the initial (and subsequent) adoption of some of this terminology was not claiming the subimperial sites of capitalism had 'empires.' It was whether the subimperial 'practices' (writ large) of states and capitalists in places like Brazil - as Ruy Mauro Marini observed them first in 1965 - were “collaborating actively with imperialist expansion, assuming in this expansion the position of a key nation,” while still acknowledging “antagonistic cooperation between the bourgeoisie of the underdeveloped countries and imperialism.” That bourgeoisie is distorted, however: “The form which dependent capital assumes upon reaching the stage of monopolies and finance capital.” Stagnation occurs due to overaccumulation of capital, resulting in so-called ‘premature deindustrialisation,’ in turn due to local capitalist ‘super-exploitation’ (which limits buying power) and the accompanying repression of poor and working people that is required to sustain extreme inequality: “Brazilian capitalism is a monster, but a logical monster: if popular consumption does not provide a market for what the most dynamic sectors of industry produce, so much the worse for popular consumption; capital will continue to accumulate without it. The result of this is a fundamental specialization of the Brazilian economy which is so logical that it becomes absurd: on the one hand the mass which produces surplus value and has essentially no access to consumption; on the other, the groups and strata which accumulate and/or consume surplus value. The divorce between the classes could not be more radical.” Compared to the productive circuits of capital, more profits are then found in the financial circuit. Profitability in the extractive industries is contingent upon global commodity price cycles. Hence: “subimperialism implies two basic components: on the one hand, a medium organic composition on the world scale of national productive apparatus, and, on the other, the exercise of a relatively autonomous expansionist policy, which is not only accompanied by a greater integration in the imperialist productive system, but also is maintained under the hegemony exercised by imperialism on an international scale.” If we work with that sort of mandate from Marini, would you not agree, that we can then derive these: *Global and regional practices considered subimperial:* · State collaboration with imperialist multilateralism (degree of control and self-interested influence at unreformed Washington-New York-Geneva multilaterals, especially IMF/WB, WTO, UNFCCC, UNSC, G20) · Corporate contributions to global value chains (measured by layers of participation and share of profits) · Corporate benefits from unequal ecological exchange (measured by the extent of positionality and uncompensated extraction especially of non-renewable natural resources) · Export of surplus capital via FDI, loans and trade (due to ‘overaccumulation crisis’, especially in order to undermine regional competitors, measured by excess capacity and pricing strategies, e.g. ‘dumping’) · Military entanglements of a self-interested or regional-hegemonic nature (e.g. current cases of frictional Chinese border conflicts from the Himalayas to the South China Sea; Russia’s invasions of Ukraine; Syria’s carve-up, revealing failures of Russia and Iran; India-Pakistan conflicts with China backing the latter; South African troops in Mozambique and DRC; Israel’s genocide of Palestine profiting BRICS firms; failure of BRICS bloc to retain coherence in relation to Board of Peace and to U.S.-Israeli wars on Iran and Lebanon)* * *Domestic practices consistent with subimperialism: * · High levels of corporate concentration and financialisation · Overaccumulation of capital in China, displaced to other BRICS economies unable to withstand devaluation in spite of tariffs, and increased dependency on commodity production and export processing · Ossified class structure with high levels of social repression and rising inequality · Accumulation by dispossession especially through neoliberal public policy and worsening super-exploitation of labour and ecological destruction · Reactionary official socio-cultural tendencies (examples include Brazilian evangelicism under Bolsonaro; Russian homophobia; Indian Islamophobia and patriarchy; Chinese hostility to Muslim Uighurs, Buddhist Tibetans, ethnic Mongolians and Hong Kong democrats; and South African xenophobia; plus in the new BRICS regimes, Egyptian militarist authoritarianism; Ethiopian ethnicism; Indonesian police brutality; Iranian discrimination based on gender and sexual preference; UAE’s tribal autocracy) Corrections are welcome. If you like, I can send more on the way subsequent Marxists have written about subimperialism, e.g. here in South Africa both before and after 1994, and in the BRICS: • Immanuel Wallerstein’s World-Systems ‘semi-periphery’ (1975) • Ibbo Mandaza’s warning about subimperialism practices of the apartheid-era South African state and capital (1980) • David Harvey’s application of the subimperialism concept to post-1970s footloose capital’s ‘spatial fix’ (2003) • Sam Moyo’s and Paris Yeros’ application of Marini’s theory to the BRICS (2013) • Samir Amin’s labelling of post-apartheid South Africa as ‘subimperialist’ (2019) • Gorden Moyo’s confirmation that in the African economy, BRICS are subimperial (2024) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#43177): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/43177 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/120952698/6024700 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/10173629/6024700/1441833971/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-