Re: The refrigerator principle (was: Re: [ox-en] No more money trickery propaganda please)
Diego Saravia <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.oekonux.english |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[Converted from multipart/alternative] [1 text/plain] I will try to keep on the theoretical p2p side of this discussion. > If someone states that by keeping your money you can earn > interest then this is obviously wrong. Fine by me. We all say stupid > things once in a while. > If I put money in a bank I earn interest, usually, in Argentina could be very risky :) if I put money/resources/capital in a productive organization I earn money/resources/whatever in fact two statements are linked together people banks production -> money money <- interest rent/interest that's capitalism and thats private ownership of production means could be capitalistic p2p process? Scientific thinking is nothing else than a method to prove > assumptions. or make predictions "prove" is a very tricky word > > and declare that > > the Oekonux list is somewhat dedicated to the functioning of an economy > > based on unilateral transitive productions of common informational or > > information-based infrastructures and their effects on the economy as a > > whole. common informational? is better to think about free (libre) informational goods I made this a topic to be able to explain why exchange based > approaches and peer production *as concepts* are mutually exclusive > (in short: exchange kills openness). That perspective is in fact > something everyone shares who wonders how non-exchange based peer > production can exist at all in an exchange based world. I think there are diferent kind of concepts informational goods are non economics goods, so exchange is not applicable to them openess kills exchange could be better description. In fact for this kind of goods, openess take them away scarcity or economy. but these is only for informational goods, not material goods, all informational goods (without copyright or with free copyright) are non economic goods or free goods, nor common, nor public ones. there are free goods developed via p2p (open source methodologies), and others developed via other methods (cathedral ones) I dont think there even are non informational p2p production do you have any example? -- Diego Saravia [email protected] NO FUNCIONA->dsa-AySywPH+/[email protected] [2 text/html] _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: [email protected]