Re: [ox-en] Re: free vs. common (was: Re: [ox-en] A name for a peer-production-based socie
Diego Saravia <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.oekonux.english |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[Converted from multipart/alternative] [1 text/plain] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_good you can see the clasification of public/common/private and club, all them economic or non-free goods so, you have free or non-free (economic) gods non-free could be public, common, private and club > * software does not come about by duplication > * its very often a community effort > * it needs protection from privatisation > > thats good reasons to recognize its also a commons. > > [2 text/html] _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: [email protected]