Re: [ox-en] A name for a peer-production-based society?

Hi Raoul and all!

Last month (34 days ago) Raoul wrote:
> A name for a peer-production-based society ?
[...]
> 3 The need and possibility to find a new word to name such a society.

I agree that it would be very useful to find a name for such a
society.

Once I used the term "GPL society" for what I now would call a society
based on peer production. "GPL society" was nice in a way because it
was a quite artificial term with a high perplexity. But it was also
wrong in a number of ways. For instance the GPL would no longer be
needed in a society based on peer production... In any case I'm not
using the term any more - instead I use clumsy constructions like
"society based on peer production". That is why I'm also looking for a
good term.

> In any case, it is obvious that nowadays using the words socialism or 
> communism without specifying the meaning given to them is source of 
> important confusions.

Yes.

BTW: When Oekonux started 10 years ago I very consciously used an
artificial word as a name to not run into this problem. I still think
this was a good decision :-) .

But for naming a type of society this is probably not a viable
approach?

> As Lawrence Lessig puts it in 
> his criticisms to Kelly's article:
> "So my argument against Kelly is that it is wrong to use a term (in the 
> context of a Wired essay at least; a philosophy seminar would invoke a 
> completely different set of ethics) that would be so completely 
> misunderstood. We choose our words. We don't choose our meaning." 
                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> (31may09) (3)

That is really a great quote!

> Since some time, I have been thinking that something like "gratisism" 
> could be a solution.
> "Gratis is the process of providing goods or services without monetary 
> compensation. It is often referred to in English as 'free of charge'. ", 
> says Wikipedia in English. And it adds: "The term gratis in English 
> comes from the Latin word "gratis" meaning "for thanks". In several 
> languages, including Italian, French, Romanian, Swedish, Spanish, 
> Portuguese, Dutch, Danish, Norwegian, German, Polish, Bahasa Indonesia 
> and Afrikaans it is the equivalent to "for free". (5)
> 
> I think that a word based on "gratis" has interesting advantages, but 
> also weaknesses.
> The advantages are of two kinds: theoretical and "communicative". From a 
> theoretical point of view it has the virtue to puts the emphasis on the 
> overcoming of the kernel of capitalism: the law of exchange value. You 
> don't sell, you don't buy. Without exchange value, the wage system and 
> the accumulation of capital become nonsenses. Use-value, usefulness as 
> the object of production instead of exchange value is highlighted.

That is in fact a very important point and gratisism makes this very
clear. However, another important characteristic - production based on
Selbstentfaltung - is not caught by gratisism.

>  From a "communicative" point of view, I see three obvious advantages:
> 1. The word gratis has an immediate meaning for every one. Even if you 
> are not familiar with the web and digital goods, you know that your best 
> relationships with others (friends, love, relatives) are, generally, 
> "gratis". 2. The word "gratisism" is new. It does not suffer from the 
> weight of "the tradition of all dead generations". The continuity with 
> the past is reinvented from a new point of view. 3. Last and... least, 
> the word "gratis" has the same meaning in more than a dozen languages.

Valid and important points.

> But I also see a weakness: "gratisism" may be identified with practices 
> that are "gratis" only apparently. Two of them are particularly frequent 
> and remain totally in a capitalistic logic. One concerns the goods 
> financed by commercial advertising, very present in the web (Google is 
> only one of the most spectacular examples). Here, the good is in reality 
> payed by the buyer of the advertized products. Furthermore, advertising 
> relays on one of the darkest aspects of the 20th century mind 
> manipulation: "A lie repeated a thousand times becomes a truth", 
> (Goebbels). The second false "gratisism" concerns the public services 
> which are sometimes said "gratis" but are in fact payed by the tax payer.
> This is not the kind of “graticism” we want. Commercial advertising and 
> taxes are meaningless in a world without money.
> I don't know how disorienting that can be, but there is here obviously a 
> problem.

I agree with you but would think that these things could be considered
neglectable. However, that is the problem when you use terms which
already exist.

> But, will we find a perfect term?

We can at least try and may be we can reach some sort of agreement. I
think the goal would be to find a term

1. which sounds well

2. is not too wrong / misunderstandable

3. is not burdened with historical meaning

Not too long ago in Oekonux we agreed on using the term "peer
production" as describing the more general phenomenon we are
witnessing. That was an important and very visible step in recognizing
Free Software - which was Oekonux started with - as part of a bigger
thing.

Contrary to "gratisism" the term "peer production" focuses very much
on the production aspect. In a way these both terms complement each
other nicely. A combination of both would thus probably not be too
wrong (2.) and not burdened with meaning (3.). But I can't think of a
term which sounds well (1.): "peergratisism"? "gratispeerism"?
"peeratism"? Well, the last one sounds sexy ;-) .

More ideas?


						Grüße

						Stefan
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: [email protected]