Re: [ox-en] Gift economies - again

"Franz Nahrada" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.politics.oekonux.english
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Stefan Merten wrote:
>
>May be you are more interested in communities / groups which share
>goods which are somehow limited - be it because their production
>involves little or no Selbstentfaltung or because their production or
>other acquiring is expensive.

expensive could also mean "requires a certain amount of time, effort,
resources"
>
>
>Then in this project it would be interesting to explore how sharing
>can be done under such conditions - especially whether it is somehow
>possible to go without implicit or explicit personal obligations or
>abstract exchange relationships. This could be interesting for
>transformative strategies especially if things work on a large scale
>basis.

I think the "abstract exchange relationship" is the root of "anonymous
flows".

I doubt if there is anything like this in a future society.  Although I do
not 
buy into the mutual obligation system that Christian Siefkes envisioned,
the 
flow of material resources might be somehow directed by social preferences.
>
>
>May be personal relationships / obligations are important for you?
>This would probably not fit well in this project.

Gift economy is not necessary a personal or obligation issue.

Franz
>


_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.