Re: [ox-en] Balancing need and Selbstentaltung by governance?

Hi Stefan & all,

Stefan Merten wrote:
> The alternative IMHO is to create an explicit governance scheme where
> people are coerced to execute societal necessary tasks as part of
> their normal lifes. The big advantage of such an explicit governance
> scheme is that it is subject to political decisions. Contrary to blind
> automatisms as just outlined political decisions are able to take into
> account different situations of people. I think this is something
> useful to strive for.

That's not really a different approach from what I describe, but a part of
it. In my book, I refer to it as "flatrate model".

(I doubt that the term "coercion" is a happy or indeed appropriate one for
such situations, but your terminology is your decision.)

Best regards
        Christian

-- 
|------- Dr. Christian Siefkes ------- [email protected] -------
| Homepage: http://www.siefkes.net/ | Blog: http://www.keimform.de/
|    Peer Production Everywhere:       http://peerconomy.org/wiki/
|---------------------------------- OpenPGP Key ID: 0x346452D8 --
Jehovah almost alone of the ancient gods never married. Never even went out
on a date. No wonder he was such a neurotic, authoritative prick.
        -- Tom Robbins, Even Cowgirls Get the Blues

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkr/zbIACgkQ301HxjRkUthVDwCfTJlxTY5DT5Rdb2hJTiYHk1oC
5GAAnjOaMjusl3rvb5ictqH0OMyKMta5
=4a20
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----