Re: [ox-en] selbst-ent-falt-ung = self-un-fold-ing
Graham Seaman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.oekonux.english |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[Converted from multipart/alternative]
[1 text/plain]
On 06/12/10 15:28, Stefan Meretz wrote:
> On 2010-06-04 12:25, Franz Nahrada wrote:
>
>> Selbstentfaltung was a refuge for us in Oekonux
>> to make a difference -
>> a terminological difference that originated in critical psychology
>> also Anette Schlemm ues this frequently
>> http://www.thur.de/philo/ku51.htm
>> http://www.thur.de/philo/ku51b.htm
>>
> There is a short text in german:
> http://www.freie-gesellschaft.de/wiki/Selbstentfaltung
>
> Someone proposed to use "thrivability" for Selbstentfaltung:
> http://www.appropedia.org/Thrivability
>
> Not bad, but I am not convinced. I don't like "we must do" sentences,
> because Selbstentfaltung is basically something I _like_ to do (no
> normatives, please).
>
>
Anette also has a text in English, a lot of which coincides with your
previous mail:
http://www.thur.de/philo/SEG_en.htm
However, her conclusions still sound to me rather 'normative':
"We hope that we can build a society, in which Mutual Self-Development
("Selbst-Entfaltung") will be the main principle of societal
self-organisation proceeded from free societal individuals."
Graham
> Ciao,
> Stefan
>
>
[2 text/html]
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: [email protected]