Re: [ox-en] Commons in a taxonomy of goods

[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
economy is a social science,
a good is not a good without society

all goods properties are social ones.

I do not understand what do you want to say with this text:

"Scarcity is not a goods property, but a social form of goods to be
produced (namely: commodity)."

If you have 5 apples and 6 persons, and every person want an apple you can
say that apples are scarce

so you need people and apples, its a social problem

but I do not understand what this can mean in terms off clasical goods
clasification for you


2010/6/16 Stefan Meretz <stefan-/[email protected]>

> On 2010-06-16 23:00, Stefan Meretz wrote:
> > > economic goods could be rival/non rival and exclusive/non exclusive
> >
> > All goods can be rival/non rival and be made exclusive/non exclusive.
>
> I wanted to say: Not only economic, but all goods can be...
>
> This does not mean, that each single good can either rival or non rival.
> Here we have the difference to excludability: Rivalry is a goods
> property, exclusion is a social result.
>
> Ciao,
> Stefan
>
> --
> Start here: www.meretz.de
> _________________________________
> Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
> Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
> Contact: [email protected]
>



-- 
Diego Saravia
[email protected]
NO FUNCIONA->dsa-AySywPH+/[email protected]


[2 text/html]

_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: [email protected]