Re: [ox-en] Commons in a taxonomy of goods

[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
> Right. Sometimes "free good" and "open access" is mixed. The first
> is an unregulated good while the latter comes with an explicit rule,
> that it can be used by all people if they agree to some conditions (of
> a license or whatever).
>
>
free software is a free good only in its distribution.

creation of free software is a very expensive (in resources) activity

when you build a car, you first designed it, then you go to mass production

with free software yo have the same two  stages, the result of the first one
is a "non-free
good", completely scarce in fact, the second one, distribution, is almost
free (marginally)

of course, open peer design reduces the creative phase costs a lot, and a
lot of people gives its time to a free soft project without asking
traditional exchange return.

but in fact the time is consumed, not monetarized, but used.




-- 
Diego Saravia
[email protected]
NO FUNCIONA->dsa-AySywPH+/[email protected]


[2 text/html]

_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: [email protected]