Re: [ox-en] Re: Scarcity and limitedness - again
Patrick Anderson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.oekonux.english |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stefan Merten wrote: > The only antidote in capitalism is competition. > Can you show me any capitalist (aka producing > for abstract exchange) who would not be glad > if all competitors would simply go away? > Well, at least history is full of attempts to close > markets and shut off competitors... Yes, this is a terrible situation where famine is constructed because Profit requires a certain amount of Poverty. Perfect competition is accomplished when every Consumer has sufficient ownership in the Means of Production - for that owner then receives the outputs "at cost". This is one reason why we try to do everything in solitary confinement instead of using the system to accomplish our goals. I have to try to be my own mechanic, my own plumber, my own farmer etc. because it allows me to avoid the form of usury called Profit. Another reason people avoid trading skills is because our tax systems punish us on both ends both as "income tax" and then as "sales tax". The state wants to minimize trade amongst ourselves because it is a puppet of the corporations, and the corporations want it minimized because it causes us to be further dependent upon them - which is the source of even more Profit. > For a peer production based society there is no > "artificial scarcity" because with no more profit > to seek there is no more basis for this. A peer-production based society can be implemented as a "User Owned" corporation under these two qualifications: 1.) The Initial investors must be Consumers of that product so their return is Product instead of Profit. 2.) The later Consumers must be treated as Investors when they pay Profit so they also gain the Property needed to eventually stop paying Profit. _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: [email protected]