Re: [ox-en] Re: Model of humans
Paul Cockshott <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.oekonux.english |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <QwrMyDWdMWRC@vZYFJ60b> |
Economic relationships tie you to millions you do not know as people. --- original message --- From: "Robin Upton" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [ox-en] Re: Model of humans Date: 20th July 2010 Time: 8:00:23 am On 19/07/10 17:12, Stefan Merten wrote: >> I look forward to an economic system in which I can priority to >> relationships, rather than >> be concerned about fiat tokens of empire. >> > Well, I think how the relationships in the economy are shaped is a > good question. Lately I learned from StefanMz that they *are* shaped > differently. But I still think you should not confuse personal > relationships with economic relationships. But you probably don't do > this anyway. > Perhaps I do. Is there a value in drawing a distinction between the two? It seems on first reflection to be the flip-side of alienated work. i.e. economic relationship (buying) comes from someone who only helps due to magic beans. Personal relationship means love, not money. Right now, I do have distinct sets of relationships, but I have yet to be convinced that this is an ideal state of affairs. >> Bearing the above in mind, I can see a future taboo against some cases of >> conditional exchange. e.g. I will not treat your life threatening >> condition unless >> you give me some magic beans. In another context, it makes perfect sense. >> e.g. I will perform an operation on you unless someone gives me use of a >> sterile operating theatre for 3 hours and some trained staff. >> [oops], ^will perform^won't perform ...but you got the vibe > But the latter is a factual precondition for the treatment - right? > You don't need to put this as a form of exchange when it's simply a > factual precondition. > > That is perfectly the difference between alienation - some magic beans > not belonging to the process - and a concrete need - the facilities to > actually perform the treatment. > I intended this as a clear example. I can see that it may not always be so clear. e.g. I need a coffee and biscuits to help me concentrate on the operation. My angle on this is designing a gift economy in which people specify (in XML) their requests and offers, and the software to match them up. Robin _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: [email protected] The University of Glasgow, charity number SC004401 _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: [email protected]