Re: [ox-en] Mapping the GNU GPL into the Physical Realm
Diego Saravia <dsa-AySywPH+/[email protected]> Tue, 6 Sep 2011 07:46:48 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.oekonux.english |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAE9KQ2FOtsgL_7eCakjZZcwD3XS0JZ2q=NWr5zZ3hM+m5LE4vQ@mail.gmail.com> |
every time you erase something, entropy is generated. Feynman dixit. 2011/9/6 Ian Hewitt <[email protected]>: > A further point of distinction is the thermodynamic behaviour of the > physical world - each time there is a conversion of form/content entropy is > created which is not the case in the virtual form ..recompiling source code > carries no great overhead apart from time (..and a little energy). > > Perhaps more care needs to be given to the design of > re-useable/reconfigurable physical objects - with due regard to > thermodynamic losses? > > Ian > > > > On 06/09/11 08:55, Lehor Meius wrote: >> >> This is very interesting. However I see a difference between physical and >> virtual objects: >> >> When a virtual Object is created from virtual Sources, the amount of >> virtual Sources remains the same. >> The possibility to create another Object is exactly the same. >> >> However, when we create a physical Object from Physical Sources, the >> amount of physical Sources decreases >> for they are locked up in a physical Object. At some point we would need >> more work in order to create an >> Object - to find additional Sources. Basically, as new Objects are >> created, access becomes more difficult >> for new Users. >> >> The only remedy I see against this is when creation of a physical Object >> does not give ownership rights, >> but instead gives *usership* rights. This means, once the Object in no >> longer used (for example the beer >> bottle after the beer has been consumed), the user has the duty to return >> it to the Source pool. Basically, >> all created physical Objects have to be returned to the Sources once they >> are no longer used. >> >> >> Lehor >> >> On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:54:37 -0600, Patrick Anderson wrote: >>> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> I've been trying to understand how the GNU GPL might apply to the >>> material world and am happily surprised with the results. >>> >>> >>> In the virtual world of software: >>> 1.) An Object is the result of {compiling} some type of Sources. >>> 2.) Sources are the inputs such as {source-code, makefiles, >>> shell-scripts, installer scripts, etc.} required to change a future >>> instance of that Object type. >>> >>> >>> In the physical world of hardware: >>> 1.) An Object is the result of {work* across time} to some type of >>> Sources. >>> 2.) Sources are the inputs such as {land and water and seeds and >>> animals and tools} required to change a future instance of that Object >>> type. >>> * Note: some Objects are occasionally created by the 'work' of nature >>> with no human intervention. >>> >>> >>> >>> So we can say physical Objects have physical Sources. >>> >>> For example, the Sources of a bottle of beer include land, water, >>> barley, hops, yeast, heated water, containers, glass (for the bottle), >>> kiln (to melt the glass), etc. - and even recursively all the sources >>> required to initially create the tools that created the tools, etc... >>> >>> >>> The GNU GPL instructs us to help every user incrementally gain at-cost >>> access the Sources of all the Objects they use. >>> >>> I think I've found a way to do this! >>> >>> The trick is to start a business that can treat some % of Profit >>> (Price above Cost) as an INVESTMENT FROM THE PAYER. >>> >>> Treating Profit as Payer Investment causes each user to slowly gain >>> co-ownership in the *growth* of that organization. >>> >>> Imagine you buy a $5 hamburger from such a place, but it only cost the >>> current owners $3 to deliver that surplus (the owners would only be >>> selling surplus, since the *primary* reason for their investments >>> would be to receive at-cost objects such as hamburgers). >>> >>> The cashier would give you a receipt showing you now have (within a >>> future vesting window) $2 invested in more land, water rights, calves, >>> and also toward paying wages, etc. >>> >>> As you continue to gain ownership (and as you also continue to pay >>> recurring costs on what you already own), you will eventually go to >>> the new restaurant your overpayments help to create, and you will show >>> your ownership credentials to prove you already own a prepared >>> hamburger as a result of your ownership in the entire tree of it's >>> production. >>> >>> When the investors will accept the objects themselves (say beer) as >>> compensation for the risk they took, there is no sale because the end >>> user already paid all the costs of production, and owns the objects as >>> a side-effect of those commitments. >>> >>> And since there is no sale, Profit doesn't even have a chance to enter >>> the picture. >>> And without a sale there is no attack-point for external governments - >>> and so no sales tax. >>> >>> >>> http://Wikipedia.org/wiki/Imputed_rent is a subset or simplified >>> version of this. >>> >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> Patrick Anderson >>> http://ImputedProduction.BlogSpot.com >>> >>> >>> We can also eliminate wages by committing to swap of skills within a >>> "closed-loop, user-owned production aggregate" *before* production >>> begins. I call it pre-barter. >>> _________________________________ >>> Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ >>> Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ >>> Contact: [email protected] >> >> _________________________________ >> Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ >> Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ >> Contact: [email protected] >> > _________________________________ > Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ > Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ > Contact: [email protected] > -- Diego Saravia [email protected] NO FUNCIONA->dsa-AySywPH+/[email protected] ==================================================================== "Disclaimer:" Haré lo que desee con los correos que reciba, quien no este de acuerdo, que se abstenga de enviarme correo a mí o a las listas donde este suscripto. En particular NO VALE ningun "disclaimer" que indique que el correo enviado es privado o sujeto a normas de empresas, gobiernos, u organizaciones de cualquier tipo. Con relación a los estados y sus leyes, analizare cualquier norma aplicable en el territorio donde eventualmente actúe en el momento, escucho a cualquiera que tenga algo que decir. Con respecto en particular a los derechos de autor, salvo acuerdo previo, gozaré plenamente de las 4 libertades con todo lo que reciba, considerandolo, en cuanto a lo patrimonial, como propio. ==================================================================== _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: [email protected]