What if DOPA requires libraries to block sites of U.S. Senate candidates? [fs]
Declan McCullagh <[email protected]> Tue, 01 Aug 2006 09:27:06 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.politech |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Previous Politech message: http://www.politechbot.com/2006/08/01/david-burt-on/ -------- Original Message -------- Subject: DOPA and political speech Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:54:06 -0500 From: Ben Masel <[email protected]> To: Declan McCullagh <[email protected]> A broad characterization of site with that many users can't help but=20 sweep much speech that doesn't fit the presumption. I, for example, have been using Myspace to promote my candidacy in the=20 Democratic Primary for the United States Senate, clearly core protected=20 speech, and pretty effective. http://www.myspace.com/ben_masel Is anyone preparing to seek injunctive relief should this pass? I want=20 in as a listed plaintiff, should this happen before my Sept. 12 Primary=20 (or after if I pull the upset of the decade v Herb Kohl.) I've thus far spotted about 30 Candidates with myspace presences. Subject: For Politech: Thoughts on DOPA Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 11:53:22 -0700 (PDT) From: David Burt <[email protected]> To: [email protected] (snip)> The filtering companies would need to fine tune > =C2=93Social Networking=C2=94 into a new category to target > this more accurately, and they may already be doing=20 > this. (For example, Myspace.com is classified by > SurfControl as =C2=93Personals and Dating=C2=94 > http://mtas.surfcontrol.com/mtas/MTAS.asp and by=20 > SmartFilter as =C2=93Dating/Social=C2=94 > http://www.smartfilterwhere.com _______________________________________________ Politech mailing list Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)