It's a Secret!

It's a Secret!

The extent of American myopia and willingness to be scammed is incredible.
Obama isn't talking. It is a secret. How do you hide half of $426.9
million dollars in contributions?

"More than half of the whopping $426.9 million Barack Obama has raised has
come from small donors whose names the Obama campaign won't disclose."
(Ken Timmerman - [Sept 29, 2008] Secret, Foreign Money Floods Into Obama
Campaign - http://www.newsmax.com)

"And questions have arisen about millions more in foreign donations the
Obama campaign has received that apparently have not been vetted as
legitimate." (ibid)

Obama raised twice the money McCain raised. It is deja vue. It happened
with Hillary. AND he spends 4 and 5 times as much. And he spins these lies
which liberals and young people and even others are too detached or too
hopeful to not want to believe him. It is spin. It is all a lie. Obama is
a liar.

It is no wonder Obama has been able to spend more. He changed his position
on public funds and half of millions of dollars are coming to him from
organizations like HAMAS. Is this the man you want to be your president?

Are any of you that foolish?

"Unlike the McCain campaign, which has made its complete donor database
available online, the Obama campaign has not identified donors for nearly
half the amount he has raised, according to the Center for Responsive
Politics (CRP). [NewsMax]

How does Obama do it? His campaign bundles money. I have written about
this before. The money is kept at a minimum where federal law does not
require the campaigns to identify donors. He should anyway. McCain does,
but it is obvious why Obama won't identify his donors. Not when most of
them are subversive and members of U.S. declared terrorist organizations.

NOT surprisingly, the MAJORITY of Obama donors never break the $200
threshold so he doesn't have to identify them. I think you can see why
that is a bad law. And those contributions that come under the $200 even
though aggregated per person at higher amount don't get listed, according
to Bob Biersack who is a spokesman for the FEC. Those amounts don't appear
anywhere. There is no way to account for them which is exactly what Obama
wants. It is a scam and we are being scammed.

"The FEC breakdown of the Obama campaign has identified a staggering
$222.7 million as coming from contributions of $200 or less. Only $39.6
million of that amount comes from donors the Obama campaign has
identified." (NewsMax)


"Under campaign finance laws, an individual can donate $2,300 to a
candidate for federal office in both the primary and general election, for
a total of $4,600. If a donor has topped the limit in the primary, the
campaign can redesignate the contribution to the general election on its
books." (NewsMax)

What would you think if Obama received 1,000 separate contributions from a
Mr Good Will - all or most of of them for only $25.?  By the way, Good
Will is from Austin, Texas and lists his employer as "Loving" and he
listed his profession as "You".  Another contributor was Mr Doodad and the
donations totaled 786 contributions. There are plenty more like this.
These are not unusual in the Obama campaign. Is there any doubt what these
are?

"The FEC has compiled a separate database of potentially questionable
overseas donations that contains more than 11,500 contributions totaling
$33.8 million. More than 520 listed their state as IR, which the FEC often
uses as an abbreviation for "information requested." Another 63 listed it
as UK, the United Kingdom." (NewsMax)

And many came in as identified from Addis Ababa, Abu Dhabi, Beijing,
Fallujah, etc. Some came in from North Korea and some from the Islamic
Republic of Iran. These are not intentionally being lax. This is fraud and
Obama continues to fund his campaign with money from terrorists.

Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs (October 7, 2008) wrote:

"Half a million dollars had been donated from overseas by unidentified
people "not employed" ... Digging deeper, all sorts of very bizarre
activity jumped at us. Dr and JJ continued to break it down and pull data
from various sources. We found Rebecca Kurth contributed $3,137.38 to the
Obama Campaign in 112 donations, including 34 separate donations recorded
in one day, How about this gibberish donor on the 30th of April in 2008. A
donor named Hbkjb, jkbkj City: Jkbjnj Works for:  Kuman Bank (doesn't
exist) Occupation:  Balanon Jalalan Amount:  $1,077.23 or the donor
Doodad, The # of transactions = 1,044 The $ contributed = $10,780.00"

"This Doodad character works for FDGFDGF and occupation is DFGFDG The more
questions we answered the more questions we discovered. Thousands of
Obama's foreign donations ended in cents. The "cents" did not make sense.
And we compared McCain donation documents to Obama's. McCain's records
are nothing like Obama's. McCain's are so clean. No cents, all even dollar
amounts.  But Obama's contained thousands of strange, odd amounts --
evidence of foreign contributors, since Americans living overseas would
almost uniformly be able to contribute dollars. Still no media." (Pamela
Geller)

"Julia Gorin told me a funny story two months ago. Her husband's co-worker
wanted to see what would happen if he tried giving a contribution to the
Obama campaign via a credit card. He used his Macy's card. The system
accepted it. He tried the same with McCain's campaign, and the transaction
wouldn't go through.  Now, obviously, down the line, the Obama transaction
would fail as well, but it goes to the point that there is no safety
system in place -- it'll just accept any and all money, which helps
explain how his campaign raised so much more money than everyone else's."
(Geller)

* This explains too how the Obama campaign can easily launder money using
this fake information to back it up.

"Despite the evidence of dirty campaign donations, crickets chirped in
news-rooms across the country. The moment my Gaza story started to get some
chatter on talk radio, the left and their supplicant handmaidens in the
media sprang into action and created a McCain illegal campaign
contribution "scandal." The Washington Post published an inaccurate
allegation and then retracted not a day later, at the risk of looking
stupid. They are jeopardizing the little credibility that they have left."
(Geller)

AND Obama's contributions are the LARGEST pool of UNIDENTIFIED MONEY to
ever come to a U.S. election. So much for the McCain-Feingold campaign
election reforms. Obama has subverted the process.  The only question you
should ask yourself is why would anyone do that? And the answer should be
as obvious as the nose on your face.

Hank Roth
Pointers: See links from http://pnews.org/
                      and http://inyourface.info/