Obamatoids

DEBUNKING THE OBAMATOIDS

The squall of the obamatoids is getting louder and louder as we learn more 
and more about Also Known As (AKA) Obama; as though they can, by sheer 
volume, drown out the facts.

With this in mind, lets look at the claims of the obamatoids.

1) AKA has presented, for all to see, his birth certificate.

Not so. What AKA has presented, through his campaign and pro-Obama 
websites, is a Certification of Live Birth (COLB). That is so stated dead 
center of the top of the document. This is not a birth certificate or a 
certificate of birth.

This Certification of Live Birth (COLB), as presented, was presented by 
FactCheck.com, FighttheSmears.org, DailyKos.com and Snopes.com, all 
parroting the same claims, all obamatoid websites. While the claim has 
been made that the varying versions appearing on the internet all emanate 
from the same document, inconsistencies from one reproduction to the next 
tend to counter this claim. One of the more obvious inconsistencies is the 
folds that appear on some copies while not on others.

No one, outside a select group of obamatoids, has actually seen the 
original document from which the copies that appear on the internet were 
made. By the same token, not one of the copies of this COLB that have 
appeared on the internet is accompanied by a notarized affidavit that it 
is authentic copy of the original. In the day and age of photoshop; the 
credibility of this document is obviously questionable.

Now lets look at the document itself. Since when did African become a 
race? On your birth certificate is your fathers ethnicity listed as 
American? Of course not; American is not a race. Neither is African. This 
document would be far more credible had it listed the fathers race as 
negro or Negroid just as white or Caucasian were also used in 1961.

Forensic specialists have signed sworn affidavits stating that the copies 
of the COLB, appearing on the internet, are forgeries; these sworn 
affidavits being inclusive of the qualifications of the forensic 
specialists to make that determination.

2) The Department of Health, Hawaii, has stated they have AKAs Hawaii 
birth certificate.

Not so. What the State of Hawaii stated was,

     Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawaii, along with 
the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee 
and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and 
verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obamas 
original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and 
procedures.

There is nothing there that states the birth certificate Hawaii holds was 
issued by Hawaii; there is nothing there that states the State of Hawaii 
holds AKAs Hawaii birth certificate.

It is very obvious, in reading the statement of the Director of Health, 
that this statement was very carefully worded, which leaves the inquiring 
mind asking why.

3) The State of Hawaii has certified authentic the various copies of the 
COLB appearing on the internet.

Not so. The only statement the State of Hawaii has made, regards AKAs 
birth record, is above.

4) AKA was born on August 4, 1961 in Honolulu, Hawaii.

There has been not one shred of proof provided that this is so. The COLB 
presented by the obamatoids is not legal proof as outlined above.

We now have it on good authority that while Governor Linda Lingle of 
Hawaii claims that AKAs birth certificate, held by the State of Hawaii, 
was not sealed, that the document has been sealed. It seems that someone 
forgot to tell the people at the Department of Health in Hawaii that said 
information was not for public consumption.

We cannot ignore the fact that Hawaii, at the time of AKAs birth, allowed 
for the registration of foreign-born children so long as one parent was an 
American citizen and had claimed Hawaii as their permanent residence for 
at least one year prior to the birth. Stanley Ann Dunham met both of these 
requirements. The birth of Stanley Ann Dunhams second child, Maya, an 
Indonesian citizen, is also registered in Hawaii.

We also know that not one hospital, then operating in Hawaii, and 
certainly not the two different hospitals AKA and his sister, Maya, have 
claimed he was born at, have any records indicating that Stanley Ann 
Dunham Obama was ever there. This does not discount the possibility that 
AKA was born outside the hospital and his birth simply attested to by his 
mother or his grandparents as was allowed at that time, causing the 
issuance of a certificate of late birth. The announcement of birth in the 
Honolulu Advertiser and Sunday Advertiser on August 13, 1961, however, 
would tend to discount the late birth scenario.

Private investigators have signed affidavits that the address, shown in 
the birth announcement, 6085 Kalanianaole Highway, is not an address the 
Obamas ever lived at. And we now know that from sometime in August of 1961 
through the Spring and Fall of 1962, Stanley Ann Dunham resided on Capitol 
Hill in Seattle, Washington, where she attended the University of 
Washington and where she had an in-house baby-sitter at least part of that 
time.

Then there is the matter of AKAs paternal step-grandmother; one of the 
several wives of his paternal grandfather, who claims she was present at 
the birth of AKA in Kenya. She has stated this before witnesses; her 
statement recorded and transcribed; affidavits provided that the 
transcription is true and accurate.

There is also the matter of the WRIF live radio interview with Kenyan 
Ambassador Peter Ogego in which Ogego stated, quite plainly, that AKA was 
born in Kenya.

And there is also the matter of the Kenyan National Assembly, on the 
occasion of November 5, 2008, going on record stating, in reference to 
Kenyan celebrations at AKAs election victory, that a Kenyan is ruling the 
USA.

5) AKA is a natural born American citizen.

There is not one shred of evidence that this is the case.

AKAs own website, FactCheck.com, states he was a dual citizen at birth. 
Dual citizenship, therefore dual loyalties, does not meet the natural born 
citizen requirement of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, United States 
Constitution.

Further, on January 1, 1967 Barack Obama was registered for school at the 
Fransiskus Assisi Primary School in Jakarta, Indonesia. We know that in 
order for AKA to attend school in Indonesia he had to be an Indonesian 
citizen. A picture of the registration page of Barry Soetoro was taken by 
an Associated Press photographer, Tatan Syuflana. This photograph shows 
Barack Obama as Barry Soetoro; his father as Lolo Soetoro; and his 
citizenship as Indonesian.

The Soetoro divorce papers, filed in Hawaii, lists two children of the 
Soetoro marriage: one minor which would have been Maya, born in Indonesia; 
and one over eighteen: this would be Barry Soetoro. And the only way Barry 
Soetoro could be listed as the legal child of Lolo Soetoro is if he were 
adopted.

When a child is adopted, and the adoption recorded, the original birth 
certificate is sealed and a new birth certificate issued. This would be 
the document on which the Certification of Live Birth abstract would be 
drawn.

So why does the COLB that the obamatoids have presented not show Lolo 
Soetoro as AKAs father and his name as Barry Soetoro?

At the point of his becoming an Indonesian citizen, the question of his 
birth certificate becomes moot, also his dual American/Kenyan citizenship. 
As Indonesia, at that time, did not allow for dual citizenship, any prior 
citizenship claims by AKA would be terminated. There has been no proof 
presented that Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Obama is even a naturalized 
American citizen.

At this point, we also know that

     a) not only did Stanley Ann Dunham use social security numbers that 
were not hers, but that AKA has also used differing social security 
numbers. If either were American citizens, this would not be necessary.
     b) while AKA was attending Occidental College in Los Angeles, 
California, a foreign student aid grant was presented to a Soetoro of 
Indonesia by the California Assembly. Coincidence? Doubtful.

6) If there was anything to this issue of AKAs eligibility, the United 
States Supreme Court would have addressed it

State courts have dismissed cases brought, regards this issue, based on 
standing, stating that the plaintiff did not meet Article III standing 
which has three requirements:

     1) the plaintiff has suffered an injury in fact,
     2) that injury bears a causal connection to the defendants challenged 
conduct, and
     3) a favorable judicial decision will likely provide the plaintiff 
with redress from that injury.

Further, the Supreme Court has consistently held that a plaintiff raising 
only a generally available grievance about government  claiming only harm 
to his and every citizens interest in proper application of the 
Constitution and laws, and seeking relief that no more directly and 
tangibly benefits him than it does the public at large  does not state an 
Article III case or controversy.

Before the fact, cases were dismissed at the state level on standing; 
after the fact, cases like Broe v Reed (Washington State), were dismissed 
as moot.

In the case of Keyes v Bowen (California), defendant AKA is claiming that 
this matter should have been addressed by the Congress; since it wasnt, 
there is no judicial remedy.

At the Supreme Court level, applications for injunctive relief and writs 
of certiorari to stop the forward progress of the election were simply 
denied without comment

Whether at the state or federal court level, the courts have side-stepped 
the issue of AKAs eligibility, based on administrative procedure, not 
based on merit  the facts of the case.

Last week, a federal district court judge dismissed a case in which his 
opinion was based on facts not in evidence. In so doing, he committed 
judicial misconduct.

7) AKA was vetted by the Democrat National Committee (DNC).

Not so. The DNC has no proof that AKA is a natural born citizen. Their 
claim that he is by virtue of his signing an affidavit to that effect 
falls flat when the courts refuse to order him to produce documents 
proving his eligibility. FOIA requests of Nancy Pelosi to produce the 
documents upon which she based her claim, when signing the affidavits of 
eligibility at the state level following the Democrat National convention, 
have gone unanswered.

8) AKA was vetted by the Federal Elections Commission (FEC).

Not so. Like the DNC, the FEC has no proof that AKA is a natural born 
citizen.

9) The American public vetted AKA by their vote.

Not so. If the people of the United States have no standing to demand AKA 
produce documents proving his eligibility, then they have no capacity to 
vet him whatsoever. And if voting for a candidate made the candidate 
eligible to be president, then the American people could vet Arnold 
Schwarzenegger or Rger Calero, the Socialist Party candidate, in the same 
manner.

10) His citizenship doesnt matter as 66,000,000 Americans voted for him.

No so. America was established on rule of law as set down by the United 
States Constitution. Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, United States 
Constitution states that the president must be a natural born citizen. 
Either we have rule of law or we have anarchy.

And we have not touched on the fact that AKA traveled to Pakistan in 1981 
on a passport that could not have been issued by the United States.

As debunked, it becomes quite clear that there is not one shred of 
evidence that AKA is a natural born citizen or even a naturalized citizen.

The sum result of the refusal of the United States Congress and United 
States Supreme Court to protect and defend the United States Constitution 
is growing anger among the American people that is reaching the boiling 
point as usurper AKA and Congress make one misstep after the next in 
addressing the downward economic spiral. This is further fueled by the 
extravagant lifestyle AKA is leading, entrenched in the White House at the 
peoples expense, and living large while the American people are suffering.

If the United States Congress and United States Supreme Court refuse to do 
their jobs, they leave the American people with no choice, under common 
law, but to take matters into their own hands.

We cannot stand by and allow this illegal alien usurper to destroy our 
nation while Congress fiddles and the Supreme Court diddles!

  2009 Lynn M. Stuter

From http://countusout.wordpress.com/