Pope Misguided Advise to Israel
EpSil0n-// <[email protected]> Mon, 18 May 2009 08:56:35 -0500 (CDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.progressive.news |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
ZOA Criticizes Pope's Supporting 'Right Of Return' & Palestinian State;
Opposing Security Fence, Minimizing Terrorism As Mere Temptation
May 14, 2009
Press Release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Morton A. Klein
Phone 1: 212-481-1500
The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) has expressed criticism and
concern over statements made by Pope Benedict XVI on his visit to Israel
and the Palestinian Authority (PA)-controlled areas, particularly his
implicit endorsement of the Palestinian so-called right of return. The
right of return would mean the entry into Israel by Palestinian Arab
refugees of the 1948-49 war and their millions of descendants, thereby
inundating Israel with hostile Arabs, demographically overwhelming Jews
and ending Israels existence as a Jewish state. Across the Israeli
political spectrum, it is regarded as death warrant for Israel.
Statements made by Pope Benedict on his visit:
Implicit support for right of return: Expressed his solidarity
with all the homeless Palestinians who long to be able to return to their
birthplace, or live permanently in a homeland of their own.
Misrepresenting Palestinian terrorism as an understandable
temptation due to implied Israeli misdeeds, rather than an inexcusable
evil: I make this appeal to the many young people throughout the
Palestinian Territories today: do not allow the loss of life and the
destruction that you have witnessed to arouse bitterness or resentment in
your hearts. Have the courage to resist any temptation you may feel to
resort to acts of violence or terrorism.
Support for Palestinian statehood: Palestinians have a right to a
sovereign homeland in the land of your forefathers, secure and at peace
with its neighbors, within internationally recognized borders.
Criticism of Israels security fence designed to keep out
terrorists: In a world where more and more borders are being opened up to
trade, to travel, to movement of peoples, to cultural exchanges it is
tragic to see walls still being erected.
Prayers for Palestinians who suffered in Gaza fighting but not
for Israelis who suffer from Palestinian rocket attacks from Gaza: Please
be assured that all Palestinian refugees across the world, especially
those who lost homes and loved ones during the recent conflict in Gaza,
are constantly remembered in my prayers.
Plight of Christians in Gaza mentioned, but only in general terms
- their persecution at the hands of Hamas and Islamists ignored: In a
special way my heart goes out to the pilgrims from war-torn Gaza: I ask
you to bring back to your families and your communities my warm embrace,
and my sorrow for the loss, the hardship and the suffering you have had to
endure. (Rachel Donadio and Sharon Otterman, In Bethlehem, Pope Laments
Israeli Wall, New York Times, May 14, 2009).
ZOA National President Morton A. Klein said, We find many reasons for
concern and even criticism in statements made by the Pope during his
visit. While acknowledging that the Pope has made important statements
regarding his concern for the plight of Christian minorities in Muslim
majority countries and called for religious tolerance and freedom in
Muslim societies, the ZOA believes the Popes implied support for the
so-called Palestinian right of return and his failure to condemn as an
inexcusable evil the culture of terrorism and support for eliminating
Israel that permeates Palestinian society represented a failure to speak
the truth. These statements and omissions obscured the nature of the
conflict and thus gave aid and comfort to Palestinian non-acceptance of
Israel.
At no time did the Pope name the root of the conflict the Palestinian
rejection of Israels right to exist as a Jewish state. But for this, peace
would have been achieved long ago. By expressing solidarity with the
Palestinian desire to return, the Pope was in effect giving sanction to
the Palestinian design to eliminate Israel by demographic inundation. Yet
the Pope knows, or ought to know, that the reason Palestinians are still
in refugee camps is because they have been deliberately incarcerated in
them as an element in a campaign to delegitimize Israel and denied
opportunity to resettle, as all other refugees have been able to do. How
much better it would have been if the Pope had called upon Arab states to
absorb the refugees and their descendents rather than keeping them penned
up refugee camps.
We are also perturbed rather than reassured by the Popes statement urging
Palestinians to have the courage to resist any temptation you may feel to
resort to acts of violence or terrorism. Though undoubtedly intended to
address the evil of terrorism, the Pope failed in this task. He presented
terrorism as a failing into which Palestinians understandably might fall,
rather than an evil that they, like all other human beings, are morally
prohibited from committing. This speaks volumes for the success of
Palestinian propaganda that has insidiously insinuated the notion that
Palestinians have been so deliberately and wantonly victimized by Israel
that they understandably turn to terrorism.
The Catholic Church has no inhibitions in forthrightly describing abortion
as morally wrong, not a mere temptation. How, then, is it possible that an
evil like terrorism wasnt condemned by the Pope merely described as a
temptation that might understandably appeal to Palestinians?
We regret that the Pope saw fit to declare that Palestinians have a right
to their own state at a time when both the Palestinian leadership and
society as a whole (as polls show) reject the right of Jews to their own
state and support the use of terrorism against Jews. How much better it
would have been for the Pontiff to say that he believes Palestinians must
meet their Oslo and Roadmap commitments to end terrorism and the
incitement to hatred and murder that feeds it before Israel can be
expected to make further concessions.
We too lament the security barrier: we would dearly wish that Israel had
never seen any need to erect it. But as its building was a direct result
of on-going terrorism that claimed over a thousand Israeli lives, we
object to the Pope criticizing this legitimate, non-lethal security
measure. What he should have done was to condemn the terrorism and
rejection of Israel that gave rise to it.
Lastly, the ZOA is also concerned that, in his address at the Yad Vashem
Holocaust memorial, the German-born Pope made no apology on behalf of
German Catholics who participated in the commission of the Holocaust, nor
make mention of German guilt for the genocide under the Nazi regime. This
is all the more surprising, in view of the Popes own service in the Hitler
Youth and German armed forces during the Nazi era. Nor did the Pope
mention the long, lamentable history of Catholic anti-Semitism, which
tragically paved the way for the anti-Semitic furies of Nazism.