We Don't Have a Clue
EpSil0n-// <[email protected]> Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:48:31 -0500 (CDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.progressive.news |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
We Don't Have a Clue The main objective of the LHC is to validify as well as explore the limits of the Standard Model of particle physics. First planned to being providing data a year ago, it has been delayed due to technical problems with the hardware. It is now scheduled to be turned on and start smashing particles in November of 2009. Originally the plan was to start small but some have encouraged a full start up with energy at 14 TeV (center-of-mass) collisions. The capability of LHC is about 7 times greater than the faster particle collider currently working at Fermilabs. Some physicists are concerned over the safety of LHC. I'm excited about the potential discoveries. But, I'm not a physicist and I can't have a valid "informed" opionion about the risk. Is it worth the risk? I think so. What are the opponents to LHC saying? They assert that the LHC has the potential to create micro black holes (comparable to primordial black holes) which could grow into massive black holes and release radiation which may be dangerous to cabon based life. There are various speculations of doomsday scenarios (there always is). There is the expectation that many theoretical particles will be created, i.e. strangelets, magnetic monopoles, Ed Whitten type "M-theory" membranes or vacuum bubbles. While some are fearful, including Toby Ord of the Humanity Institute where he is a research associate, others, such as Sir Martin Rees, the famous English astrophysicist who wrote about it in his book, Our Final Century: Will the Human Race Survive the Twenty-First Century? - the risk is small - at the "upper limit" only 1 in 50 million for the probability of a catastropic "end of time" as we know it type event. We may know a lot more than we did a decade ago but there is very much we don't know. We don't even have a clue about the universe; that is, what constitutes over 90% of it. Hank Roth (The InterNUT has changed exponentially from what it once was. It has lost its usefullness [my view]. I'm considering a VPN here for those who are serious about discussing the mysteries of life - in lieu of soundbites and wasted space and time on social networking and blog sites. If you are interested in critical "intelligent" discussion, you may like to apply for access. Let me know. HR)