The ‘Meaning’ of 9/11 It’s not what yo u think

The ‘Meaning’ of 9/11
				It’s not what you think	
						
				 
				by Justin Raimondo, 
				September 10, 2010			 							
								Email This
 | 
							Print This
 | 
							
						
							Share This
							

								| Antiwar Forum				
							 				
		
	 

				
		
		
		
			
				
				
					One would think that after nine years at least some of the anger, the horror and shock of the 9/11 terrorist attacks would have dissipated: but no. A glimpse
 at the headlines, a few days before the somber anniversary, disabuses 
us of this hopeful notion: a crazed pastor out in the boonies somewhere 
is burning Korans, and the commander of our forces in Afghanistan feels compelled to respond, as does the President. The proposal
 to build a Muslim community center blocks from "ground zero" – modeled 
on Jewish community centers ubiquitous in New York – is met with furious opposition, and the "anti-Islamization" movement spearheaded by bigots
 takes off, with mosques all over the country under attack. Physical 
attacks on Muslims, or people perceived as Muslim, escalate: a New York 
City cabbie is assaulted by a crazed Islamophobe, and people who have lived in this country for the whole of their lives are afraid. 
What’s going on? Andrew Sullivan,
 writing on his popular blog, writes he is "at a loss to understand why 
so many have reacted so ferociously to this project." After all, Imam Feisel Rauf, the Muslim cleric who wants to build Cordoba House, is a moderate who has condemned Islamic extremism: Rauf was sent by the Bush administration overseas to act as an ambassador of good will to Muslim countries. So where is the ferocity coming from?
To find the answer to this question, we just have to follow the money, and thankfully Ken Vogel and Giovanni Russonello over at Politico have done just that. After detailing the money coming into the Cordoba House project from mainstream donors like the Rockefellers, they write:
"There’s also big money behind the mosque opposition, as 
highlighted by the relationship between [David] Horowitz’s Los 
Angeles-based nonprofit, Jihad Watch  –  the website run by Spencer 
"dedicated to bringing public attention to the role that jihad theology 
and ideology play in the modern world"  –  and Joyce Chernick, the wife 
of a wealthy California tech company founder.
"Though it was not listed on the public tax reports filed by 
Horowitz’s Freedom Center, Politico has confirmed that the lion’s share 
of the $920,000 it provided over the past three years to Jihad Watch 
came from Chernick, whose husband, Aubrey Chernick, has a net worth of 
$750 million, as a result of his 2004 sale to IBM of a software company 
he created, and a security consulting firm he now owns. 

"A onetime trustee of the …Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Aubrey Chernick led the effort to pull together $3.5 million in venture capital to start Pajamas Media, a conservative blog network …
"The David Horowitz Freedom Center had a budget of $4.5 million last 
year, according to its tax filings, of which $290,000 came from the 
conservative Bradley Foundation, which also gave $75,000 to the Center 
for Security Policy last year. Horowitz has received an average of 
$461,000 a year in salary and benefits over the past three years, while 
Spencer has pulled in an average of $140,000, according to the center’s 
IRS filings."
Laura Rozen follows up on her Politico
 blog, detailing the trail of donations from 2008 990 filings for 
Chernick’s charitable foundation, the Fairbrook Foundation, listing all 
the familiar suspects  – CAMERA, Horowitz, MEMRI, Frank Gaffney’s Center
 for Security Policy, the Israeli nationalist "Stand With Us" campus 
project – and a few less familiar, such as the American Friends of Ateret Cohanim, dedicated to thwarting our stated policy of no more settlements where it counts: in East Jerusalem. 
Millions pour into the coffers of these groups, all of which are 
dedicated to one overriding principle, one goal: advancing Israel’s 
national interests in the US. The serpentine convolutions of the 
Chernick connection, linking one front group to another, encircle the 
political and temperamental spectrum, ranging from the Jewish Federation
 Council of Greater Los Angeles (over $900k) to the many hundreds of 
thousands given to hardline neoconservative outfits like the Hudson 
Institute, the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, not to mention
 Pajamas Media ($7 million, in collusion with venture capitalist James "extensively experienced in multimillion-dollar technology transfer and license agreements " Koshland) and a mass campaign to distribute DVDs of the virulently anti-Muslim film "Obsession."
The aim of all this giving is to create and sustain an obsessive hatred of Muslims, all
 Muslims, and garner support for Israel. The fulminations of Newt 
Gingrich and the flaxwn-haired harpies of Fox News, who rail against the
 "ground zero mosque" seem, on the surface, to make no sense. Are they 
really saying that they want the US to declare war on the billion-plus 
Muslims who inhabit the planet earth? This, after all, is precisely what
 Osama bin Laden has repeatedly said: that all the world’s Muslims must 
unite under al-Qaeda’s bloody banner because the West, in alliance with 
Israel, is out to destroy Islam, and it is therefore the duty of the 
faithful to wage jihad against the US. 
The Israelis, having long ago declared war on all the other nations 
of the region, want us in their camp, and that is precisely what 
occurred with stunning speed before the smoke cleared from the site 
where the World Trade Center once stood. "We’re all Israelis now!" exulted Martin "Palestinians are subhuman" Peretz, over at The New Republic. Benjamin Netanyahu, who is today the Prime Minister of Israel, told
 an audience at Bar Ilan University “We are benefiting from one thing, 
and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American
 struggle in Iraq,” according to the Israeli newspaper Ma’ariv. The attack, he averred, “swung American public opinion in our favor” – and now that he and his fellow extremists are in power in Tel Aviv, they are making sure public opinion stays in their favor. 
The craziness that ensued in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks 
had to be sustained if Israel was to take full advantage of the moment –
 a moment their intelligence operatives anticipated, according to Fox 
News, in a four-part series by their topnotch journalist Carl Cameron, which started out as follows:
"Since September 11, more than 60 Israelis have been arrested or 
detained, either under the new patriot anti-terrorism law, or for 
immigration violations. A handful of active Israeli military were among 
those detained, according to investigators, who say some of the 
detainees also failed polygraph questions when asked about alleged 
surveillance activities against and in the United States. 

"There is no indication that the Israelis were involved in the 9-11 
attacks, but investigators suspect that they Israelis may have gathered 
intelligence about the attacks in advance, and not shared it. A highly 
placed investigator said there are “tie-ins.” But when asked for 
details, he flatly refused to describe them, saying, ‘evidence linking 
these Israelis to 9-11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence 
that has been gathered. It’s classified information.’"

Fox News has never retracted a word of this story, although they did – after 
  pressure from the Israel lobby – delete it from their web site. It was never 
  mentioned again, at least in "respectable" quarters, and, to be sure, 
  it was never forgotten, thanks to the Internet, where Carl Cameron will be exposing 
  the Israeli connection to the 9/11 terrorist attacks unto eternity. 
Cameron’s noting that "more than sixty" Israelis had been arrested 
immediately after 9/11, along with and under the same legal rubric as 
thousands of Arabs, had also been noted here in this space,
 before the Fox News broadcasts. Why, I asked in a column, was the US 
government rounding up Israelis, of all people – unless there was some 
kind of Israeli connection to the attacks? The answer came in Cameron’s 
reporting, and subsequent stories in the "mainstream" media: the 
Israelis, whose intelligence services had been very active on our soil in the months leading up to 9/11, had been following
 the hijackers, shadowing their every move, without telling us – almost 
as if they were protecting them rather than trying to stop them. 
What happened on September 11, 2001, has changed the shape of 
history, and certainly determined the utterly disastrous course of US 
foreign policy since that day. We have launched a war of retribution 
against the entire Muslim world, a vast campaign of bombings, drone attacks, occupation, and terror unleashed on the peoples of the Middle East, from Iraq to Pakistan. This is precisely why the Israelis didn’t tell us what Mohammed Atta and his co-conspirators
 were up to, although – if we take Fox News seriously, and I realize 
there are plenty who don’t –  there is no doubt that they had it in 
their power to stop the whole operation before the hijackers had a 
chance to strike. All they had to do was tell us – and they didn’t. This
 is the "intelligence failure" – not the lack of centralized 
information, not the competition between the CIA and the FBI – that made
 the 9/11 terrorist attacks possible: the perfidy of our Israeli "ally."
 
The Israelis didn’t dive-bomb the World Trade Center and the Pentagon with commandeered airliners: Atta and his gang did.
 Yet they could have prevented it – but why should they have? After all,
 the attacks have  swung public opinion in their favor, as Netanyahu 
boasted – surely a foreseeable development. 
Today, nine years after the event, the Israel lobby is using the 
anniversary of the attacks to whip up anti-Muslim hysteria to a fever 
pitch, and they have plenty of bucks to do it. These people – who, as 
Juan Cole points out, represent a minuscule fraction of the pro-Israel 
population in the US, and stand out like a couple of sore thumbs from 
the overwhelmingly liberal Jewish community – mean business, and there’s only one way to fight them. It’s time to play hardball – just like they do. 
I was warned, before raising the possibility of an Israeli connection
 to 9/11, that I was touching a live wire, that my career – such as it 
is – would be destroyed, and that I would be banished to the 
hinterlands, where various obsessives trade conspiracy theories and 
argue over whether it’s the Bilderbergers or the Illuminati who control 
the world. 
It hasn’t happened, but I wouldn’t care if it did. As Ayn Rand once 
said: I’m not brave enough to be a coward – I see the consequences too 
clearly. We see the consequences of 9/11 all around us, in the 
hate-wrinkled face of the Koran-burning preacher, in the shrill 
shrieking of Pamela Geller whose anti-Muslim rallies in the vanished shadow of the Trade Towers are as ugly as she is: we see it in the faces of Pakistani refugees, huddled in disease-infested camps, as they flee the US invasion of death-dealing drones. 
Think about it: the leadership of a nation that betrayed us, that watched, impassively – or, perhaps, gleefully
 –  as Islamist terrorists wreaked deadly havoc on our two biggest 
cities, has a vast and well-funded propaganda network in this country 
dedicated to stoking hatred of Muslims. And they are certainly doing a 
very good job of it.
How do they get away with it? 
So, you want to know the "meaning" of 9/11? It is, as Martin Luther King put it, this:
"In the End, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends."
NOTES IN THE MARGIN
I’m taking my show on the road this autumn, to campuses around the country, 
  talking about some of the ideas expressed in Wednesday’s column on "Anti-Interventionism: 
  The Left-wing Tradition." My talk is entitled "Why Has the Left Sold 
  Out the Antiwar Movement?" – which is sure to provoke a controversy, or 
  at least that’s the hope.
The libertarian student movement, organizing nationally under the leadership of Young Americans for Liberty,
 is the most exciting – and important – development since the birth of 
contemporary libertarianism itself. Murray Rothbard, who founded the 
modern libertarian movement in his living room (and, back then, believe me, it was
 just big enough to fit in his modest-sized living room), would be 
thrilled if he were alive today. That’s because they’re hard core, and 
hard workers, busy building a burgeoning organization dedicated to 
ending the Fed and ending the wars the Fed makes possible.
 Who would’ve thought?! That’s one reason I’m taking this tour, but 
another is to engage in dialogue with the left: to wake them up to the 
fact that a united antiwar movement, organized around the single issue 
of US military intervention overseas, is a moral imperative. 
If you’re interested in booking me at your campus, write [email protected], or call the Antiwar.com office, at: 510-217-8665.