Wikileaks leaks toxic acid in every direction, except to Israel

Wikileaks leaks toxic acid in every direction, except to Israel
By Dr. Tariq Shadid at alethonews.wordpress.com


Let us ponder for a second about the meaning of ‘leaking’. When something is 
leaking, it is usually understood that some fluid substance that is supposed to 
be flowing in a certain direction, is escaping from its designed route because 
of a defect in the structure that was built to guide it. Usually, if you have a 
leaking pipe in your water system, your main problem is that you are unable to 
control the flow of it, and water goes into directions where you don’t want it 
to be going.

However, the definition of ‘Wikileaking’ seems to be following entirely 
different laws of nature. Indeed, the information is flowing away from the 
secret pipelines it was originally guided into. However, the strange thing about 
‘Wikileaking’ is that Israel, a country widely known for its secret dealings and 
cunning intelligence service, is managing to keep dry feet in spite of the 
massive political flooding allegedly caused by Wikileaks’ founding father, 
Julian Assange.

The lack of control that is so typical of other forms of ‘leaking’, certainly 
does not seem to apply to ‘Wikileaking’ – instead it looks like it is under 
perfect control, and carefully guided in such a way that it only serves the 
interests of one state, namely that of Israel.

Assange takes a leak, the world jumps up

Barely a country in the world that is actively involved in Middle East and other 
international affairs, either by choice or by geographical location, has been 
spared by Assange’s latest opening of his Pandora’s box of revelations. It is 
hard to visit a news source these days, without the word ‘Wikileaks’ jumping 
into your view at least once, and revealing some scandalous backdoor deal, 
secret agreement or embarrassing hidden relationship between governments who on 
the surface seem to be diametrically opposed to each other in the political 
spectrum.

Since the list of countries that have faced these embarrassments includes 
Obama’s United States, many anti-imperialist activists around the world have 
been anxiously awaiting the latest leaks, and are now engaging in discussions 
about the implications of many of these so-called astounding revelations. Julian 
Assange is being hailed worldwide by people who are critical of their 
governments as the activist who was able to embarrass governments, helped only 
by a small group of independent supporters. His star is rising rapidly, and 
although sounds of cynicism can be heard here and there, the overwhelming noise 
resounding in progressive circles is one of loud cheers for this long-awaited 
‘champion of the ordinary man’.

What many seem to be failing to be notice however, is that although the list of 
countries that were painfully embarrassed by the publication of their secret 
cables, memo’s and meetings, includes the Palestinian Authority, Saudi Arabia 
and other Gulf states, Egypt and the United States – where Obama is suffering 
from serious problems from a ‘Tea Party’ he was not invited to – one of the main 
actors in the dirty political game of Middle East animosities and alliances is 
remaining completely unharmed: Israel.

Much ado about old news

What are Wikileaks telling us? That Saudi Arabia poured oil on the flames 
against Iran? We already knew that. That Abbas’ administration as well as the 
Egyptian government were very well informed about Israel’s genocidal military 
assault on Gaza in the winter of 2009? There is nothing new about that either. 
The list goes on and on, and the main victims of embarrassment are leaders of 
Arab governments. But what is so new about that? Doesn’t almost every Arab in 
the world who reads newspapers, watches Al Jazeera and has a certain degree of 
understanding of Middle East politics, already know about the extent and scope 
of secret relations in the region? Even many people living outside of the Arab 
world are largely aware of this.

Oana Lungescu, spokeswoman for NATO, called Wikileaks’ revelations about the 
presence of American nuclear missiles in Europe – mainly the Netherlands, 
Belgium and Germany – ‘dangerous’ on November 29. Why exactly would something be 
dangerous, if it is a commonly known fact that has now only been confirmed yet 
again? Didn’t earlier revelations have no effect, so why would these new ones do 
that? Does the fact that Obama, Sarkozy, and the Chinese leadership have all 
condemned Wikileaks and its founder, make any significant difference?

The answer to these questions is: yes, these revelations are indeed causing 
unpleasant domestic situations all around the world, and creating electoral 
problems and other political embarrassments for governments everywhere – except 
in one place, namely Israel.

No worries: Assange will tell you who to trust

Julian Assange, ‘master revealer’ of international conspiracies, apparently also 
is highly irritated by people questioning the events of 9/11. In an interview in 
the Belfast Telegraph on July 19, 2010, he was asked about the 9/11 attack, and 
answered: “I’m constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false 
conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real 
conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud.”

Apparently Julian ‘Robin Hood’ Assange finds the story of pilots who fly an 
airplane full of people straight into a humongous skyscraper full of 
unsuspecting citizens, just because some hysterical hijacker is holding a 
box-cutter against their jugular veins, perfectly believable. He apparently also 
believes that when you fly an airplane into the top floors of one of the world’s 
largest buildings, in a horizontal direction, the building will not only 
spontaneously collapse all the way down to its basement in a vertical direction, 
but will indeed be transformed into a powdery dust – except of course the 
completely undamaged passport of one of the alleged hijackers, that was 
miraculously found among the ruins of the World Trade Center.

Unless you, dear reader, also believe in fairy tales, this should certainly make 
you wonder. So much for your credibility, Mr Assange.

Cui Bono?

In politics there is a golden rule for understanding what may be the driving 
force behind unexpected mysterious events. This rule is known as ‘Cui Bono’, 
which is Latin for: ‘who benefits?’

Browse through all the news sources available on the latest Wikileaks 
revelation, and try to find even only one revelation that actually damages 
Israel, even though so many of the revealed documents are directly or indirectly 
connected to Middle East politics, and to a large extent to Israeli affairs. Did 
you find any document among them that either creates difficulties for the 
government of the Zionist entity, or even slightly embarrasses it? Think about 
it well, you will find that the answer is a very simple “No”.

Does it not strike you as interesting or remarkable, that many of the 
revelations about Middle East affairs are of direct benefit to Israel? If it 
hasn’t, read them again, and give it some thought.

Cui bono? Israel. Therefore, who is the prime suspect behind the phenomenon 
‘Julian Assange’? You tell me, or just prove me wrong by showing me one 
Wikileaks document that would make Binjamin Netanyahu and his rogue companions 
scratch their heads, or even become only slightly uncomfortable. My suspicion 
grows stronger every day, and is not deterred by Interpol’s announcement on 
December 1 that Julian Assange is wanted for an alleged sexual harassment case 
in Sweden. It is obvious that he is a man who has angered many people of power, 
regardless of whether he is actually guilty in that harassment case or not. The 
problem however is that none of these people of power are Israeli, and that says 
a lot. You never bite the hand that feeds you, do you, Julian?