Re: BAO and Behavior Analsis as a "Cult"
Joseph Cautilli <[email protected]> Fri, 19 Apr 2002 19:11:32 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.psychology.behavior-analysis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
And of course I agree completely. Joe On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Michael Weinberg wrote: > With regard to the issue of Behavior Analysis becoming its own separate profession - > I can say that here in Florida that is not even a question but a reality. The fact is > that the profession of Applied Behavior Analysis has been separated from psychology > in state law by the state legislature some years ago due to the lobbying efforts of > FABA, which need to continue for ABA to enjoy such autonomy as a profession. It has > resulted in independent training programs at universities and by private parties who > are CBAs to flourish. An excellent example is that since coming to Florida from > Pennsylvania, I have become a Board Certified Behavior Analyst, and now teach my own > class sponsored by my agency, and that is approved through our own behavior analyst > mechanisms (Mike Hemingway has such authority for state of Florida certification > programs in behavior analysis, and now the Board under Jerry Shook has such > authority). Florida has a well-organized peer review process for the approval and > review of restrictive behavior programs, and state laws governing best practices in > the field of behavior analysis. Only CBAs with extended priviliges or with board > certification have authority to author and monitor behavior plans that involve > restrictive interventions, and/or address particularly dangerous types of behavior > such as self-injury or aggression, and to vote on the peer review panels to approve > such plans for other agencies. FABA hosts a well-organized and well-attended > conference on behavior analysis each year with presentations by leaders in the field > nationally attending and presenting (e.g. Jack Michael, Murray Sidman, the late Glen > Latham, and so on). > > I think this is an attestation to the role behavior analysts can have in society. It > could risk becoming cult-like, but we need to also monitor ourselves to prevent this > from happening. Behavior analysts are also diverse in their backgrounds as I believe > Joe is alluding to in his statements. This will allow for opportunities to learn from > one another through forums such as BAO. > > Mike > > > Subject: Re: VIP & BAO.ORG > > Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 00:37:37 -0400 > > From: Joseph Cautilli <[email protected]> > > Reply-To: "Behavior2000: Behavior and Digital Technology List" > > <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > > > Bill Verplank asks two critical questions about BAO (1) Are we making > > Behavior analysis a cult? (2) Are we only talking to ourselves? > > > > The question of cult status is an important one. BAO is the publisher of > > the Behavior Analyst Today (BAT). BAT has always published thoughtful > > critiques of Behavior Analysis. For example Steven Hayes wrote an article > > some issue back warning behavior analyst's of the exact things that > > Verplank points out. In addition, the most recent issue of BAT publishes > > the strongest critique of behavior analyst of exaggerated claims for > > children with autism (check out hte article by James Herbert). Thus, I > > believe that we print both sides of the issues. We are committed to > > science, not and I repeat not religon. We will publish, even Bill critique > > if you can find the energy to write it up. ( I have been very concerned > > about you being on a venterator for the last year, so I mean energy > > sincerly- we may not always agree but my concern for you is real). Do I > > believe that Behavior analysis has reached hte point where it will become > > its own profession. To this I say yes. Will it replace all other > > professions, never nor would I want it too. BAO is just a recognition > > thatthe field of behavior analysis has moved into becoming an alternative > > to psychology for those seekign behavior change. Will we be superior, > > probably in many areas. Still in others we might not be and we should be > > humble about this and acknowledge this. > > > > Are we only speaking to ourselves? I teach in a teacher education masters > > program. I serve as an appleate due process officer in teh state of > > Pennsylvania. I am also Director of Clinical Team services in a local > > mental health clinic and run an extensive community based service program, > > many of the people who work in the program are not, nor probably will > > never be behaviorists. Thus, the vast majority of my day is spent talking > > to educators and clinicians not to convert them but to apply sklills to > > practical problmes which I help them solve. Is BAO only speaking to > > itself? BA is the offical website of the Behavior Analysis SIG at the > > Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy (a SIG I founded and > > continue to serve as president). AABT is a largely cogntive organization. > > Cogntivists have and will continue to write articles for BAT in areas > > where the editoral staff feels grounds for integration are possible. Check > > out the next four issues Spanning the next year and you will find that > > many of the front running clinicans in the field of anxiety disorders, > > post traumatic stress disorder, and depression will be writing articles > > for BAT. A second group that BAT serves are those in the Clnical Behavior > > Analysis SIG at ABA. This SIG is far from opposed to alternative > > traditions. We have published a series of articles from this group > > covering everything from pain to disociative identity disorder. we have > > another series of articles coming up from this group critiquing there own > > approach to therapy and looking at the growing pains for Clinical Behavior > > Analysis. Another area where BAT vertures to encourage discussion is in > > its soon to come Sunday lecture Series. The Sunday Lecture Series (SLS) > > will be provided by the Walker institute group and will provide ACT 48 > > continuing education credits to teachers in Pennsylvania. SLS plans to > > provide 3 hour workshops every Sunday morning in the up coming year. These > > workshops will cover things like functional behavioral assessment, direct > > instruction, classroom mangament, curriculum based measurement, curriculum > > based assessment, etc. > > > > I offer the above as only a brief example of why I must respectfully > > reject your statements about BAO. I do understand your decision not to > > join Neitche and become a VIP to the BAO site.While your decision saddens > > me personally, I wish you the best ( I hope that we will be having this > > discussion ten years from now- at which time I will probably be saying > > "see I told you so!;-)"). Remember the invitation is always an open one. > > > > Joe > > > > P.S. As a side note, while not an easy decision for me, I support the > > Edison take over. Edison has supported Direct Instruction curriculums in > > the past. In addition, I support Temple's new role. While I am not at this > > point personally involved at this point, I believe that this will put alot > > of new ideas into the system and alot of old issues might be settled. > > > > P.P.S. BAO is all the behavior analysis, with none of the things that you > > hate like beggin' spam. > > > > On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, William S. Verplanck wrote: > > > > > (1) Sorry, Joe, under no circumstances would I participate in this > > > program. It's no more, and no less, one more step in the direction of the > > > development of behavior analysis, and especially 'applied' behavior > > > analysts, into a cult. > > > > > > To quote myself: > > > > > > "We're great at explaining ourselves to ourselves and at neglecting to note > > > that there are many others with whom we should converse, to whom we may > > > contribute, from whom we might learn, and with whom we may > > > accommodate. Behavior analysis must _not_ become a cult." > > > > > > There is already far too much evidence that the process of cult-formation > > > is already too far advanced* > > > > > > Today's NYT reports that 42 (1 out of every 6) of Philadelphia's schools > > > (most failing victims of educationalism?) are being privatized, most of > > > them contracted out to the "Edison" people, five to Temple University, > > > three to the Univ. of Pa, and the remaining fourteen to four other bodies, > > > with a variety of methodologies. Do any of these apply the methodologies > > > of applied behavior analysis? Will the able behavior analysts (both exptal > > > and applied) at Temple participate? If not, why not? How many such > > > schools and charter schools have behavior analysts set up, worked in _or_ with? > > > > > > Are we talking only to ourselves, and not to parents, school boards, review > > > boards, and those politically responsible for education? > > > > > > Shouldn't behavior analysts be out there running schools and teaching, by > > > example? (Whatever became of Don Cooke's very beh. an. endeavors?) > > > > > > (2) I'd like to believe that I'm totally out of the loop, laboring > > > under a great misapprehension, and that the foregoing is altogether > > > wrong-headed. Then, there's another reason I can't participate in > > > Nietsche. I'm 86 and live on the end of a fifty or sixty foot oxygen > > > tube. Emphysema precludes long-term commitments--of which I already have > > > too many! > > > > > > W.S.V. > > > > > > P.S. I note that the record of Edison's schools is lousy. Should behavior > > > analysts try to teach _them_ something? > > > > > > W.S.V. > > > > > > > > > > > > _____________________________________________ > > > William S. Verplanck [email protected] > > > An award-winning site: http://web.utk.edu/~wverplan/ > > > http://web.utk.edu/~wverplan/kantor/kantor.html > > > _____________________________________________ > > > >