Re: The Fascinating Case of Marty Eisen
[email protected] Wed, 17 Apr 2002 10:05:17 EDT
| Newsgroups | gmane.psychology.behavior-analysis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In a message dated 04/17/2002 9:51:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: << On a related note, see CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION, MAR 29, 2000, P. A10 for the fascinating story of Marty Eisen, a mathematics professor here at Temple who was fired from his tenured position by President David Adamany. >> Another aspect of this is that it takes only a few "celebrated" cases such as this for the message to get through. How would they know he had "graded too hard"? The administrators were not in his classroom observing him teach. The only evidence they could have had was (1) the grades he turned in, (2) student evaluations of the course, and/or (3) student complaints to the dean or other administrators. Low evaluations are one thing, and something to be frowned upon. But students knocking on the dean's door and disrupting his or her day with complaints, why, that's downright intolerable! That's a problem that needs to be solved! The problem is people knocking on the door and complaining. The solution is to get rid of the source of the complaints. And, my goodness, not even tenure gives protection. I don't know the full details of this case, and am not about to get a subscription to the Chronicle just so I can read one article, so there could be details that are what could be called unusual or extenuating circumstances. Under the typical lecture-assign-and-test instructional system you find at universities (Skinner in Technology of Teaching discusses these systems), where students are graded "on the curve," it is possible that you could find extremism at the other end. It is possible that the professor went overboard, shall we say, in grading student performance and learning. Not having the details at hand, I can't say. But, in the larger context it may not matter. The larger context is the university environment (the smaller context is the classroom). In that larger context what matters is the message given out: That tenure will not protect you from being fired for grading too harshly. As I said, this means that professors will not rock the boat, will not do anything that risks getting terminated. If they have to hand out mostly A's and a few B's, it's no skin off their rear. "Grade high and forget about it," may become the salient practice selected.