Re: Rights v Responsibilities
Jon Meinecke <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.recreation.bicycle.touring.phred |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Rod Skeggs <touringindochina-/[email protected]> wrote: > Of course, no matter where you go you will always get > self centered imbeciles who believe their rights exceed > your rights Yes. There's also civility and cooperation that go along with rights and responsibilities... On roads, I'm generally slower than other traffic. I generally try to let faster traffic pass without delaying them unnecessarily while not encouraging unsafe passing. I try to ignore any verbal abuse. On multiuse paths, I'm faster than many other users. I don't zip by, passing too close, or yell... I slow down, say hello, and wait until it is safe to pass. > "stop the vehicle and get out so we can discuss it like > men! Sadly, those types rarely stop? I hope you mean engage in the mutually respectful exchange of ideas through polite conversation. %^) My roadside efforts in this respect have not met with much success. Entertaining, yes. Successful in changing contentious driver behavior, not so much. A friend and I did were waiting in line at a stop light. Stopped side by side behind two or three cars. The driver of the vehicle in front of us steps out of his car to 'let us know' that we should not be riding in the road. I said, "I'm sorry, but you are mistaken, cyclists are allow to ride in the road..." He replied that his police officer friend had told so and that we needed to "get out of the road'. I suggested his friend might need to review Texas transportation code regarding bicycles*. He said, no, we were wrong, he was right. We offered to call police and wait for them to arrive, but he declined to wait. %^) * we were within 'code' - The lane was less than 14 feet wide. - We were no more than two abreast. and (under non-bicycle-specific part of the code) - We were not impeding traffic. (we were waiting for the traffic light to change) Jon