Re: How To Fit A 'Compact' Touring Frame?

Several days ago, I inquired:

> I'm considering the purchase of a late 90's Cannondale Touring Bike with 
> the 'Cad 2' Touring Frame (sharply sloping top tube).  I'm much more 
> familiar with the earlier Cannondale models that featured the 3.0 Series 
> Touring Frame (featured a level top tube). I'm 5'9" tall, with about 
> average proportions and a 31.75 inseam. The 21" frames (3.0 Series) were a 
> good fit. Over the years, I owned a couple of these 3.0 series touring 
> bikes and was very happy with them.
>
> My question is should I still stick with the 21" frame size  even  though 
> I'll be purchasing a Cad 2 frame or could I reasonably down size to the 
> 19" Cad 2 frame and use a longer seat post and high rise stem to get the 
> seat and handlebar where I need them to be?  I'm getting older (63 years 
> young) and not as flexible as I used to be. I'd like to try the 19" frame 
> as I think it might be easier to mount/dismount as I get older.  OTOH, if 
> it's just a bad fit, I'd rather just pass on the idea and go with the old 
> 21" standby.
>
> Anyone have any suggestions or ideas that might guide me to the right 
> decision?.

I was surprised at the high number of responses I received. A few thought 
that the 19" Cad 2 frame was a viable option.  The majority recommended 
against it, citing toe clip overlap and the aesthetics penalty of a very 
long seat post and high rise stem. Several responders pointed me in the 
direction of the Nashbar aluminum touring frame ($99.00) and matching fork 
($49.00).  After researching the matter, I've decided to go with the Nashbar 
frame & fork option. This frameset gets generally rave reviews from current 
owners. I have a wheel set and most of the other necessary components 
already here in stock. My intention is to score either the 54cm or 56cm 
frameset.  Right now I'm waiting patiently for nashbar to run one of their 
20% off sales that will offset the higher shipping costs.  As I have almost 
all of component parts, I think the nashbar option represents the most 'bang 
for the buck'  option.

Thank you to all who responded. As is generally the case, I find the advice 
here useful, practical, and experience driven.

Be Safe Out There

Glenn
Mount Joy, Pa.